Subject:
|
Re: Space Denominations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Nov 2000 00:58:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
630 times
|
| |
|
|
Mark Sandlin wrote in message ...
>
> I agree with ya there, Paul. I think they should have kept the BT1 figs and
> used the BT2 Spaceships.
I think even a better BT2 torso would have been fine. Oh, and printing on
the helmet, which looked great on Futuron and Spyrius. If only they'd used
it (or thought of it) a couple of subthemes earlier.
> >
> <sniiiiiiiiiiiip>
>
> > I'd rather like to see some MOCs like
> > that... might even try one myself.
>
> Speaking of which, when are we gonna see some more pics of your big cruiser
> thingy you put on Jon's site? Huh? Huh?
Hehe :-) Uhh, actually I was planning to scrap the ship and build a bigger
version, after recent "bulk" set purchases, which included several
Exploriens sets. It would certainly be a shame if I didn't make some more
photos... but I'm not satisfied with how they come out, my digital camera's
flash results in very washed out pictures. I was waiting until I had a
decent lighting setup.
Thirdly, I was planning to hold off on pictures until I had enough models
built to photograph a storyboard... and then you and Dan threw down the
creative gauntlet ;-)
Cheers,
Paul
LUGNET member 164
http://www.geocities.com/doctorshnub/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Space Denominations
|
| (...) I agree with ya there, Paul. I think they should have kept the BT1 figs and used the BT2 Spaceships. (...) <sniii...iiip> (...) Speaking of which, when are we gonna see some more pics of your big cruiser thingy you put on Jon's site? Huh? (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.space)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
