Subject:
|
Re: Space Denominations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sun, 5 Nov 2000 15:46:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
744 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.space, Paul Baulch writes:
> Well, if you think that the BT2 sets generally sucked (like I don't) then I
> could see how one would draw that conclusion.
I never said I didn't like them... I just said that I see them as hippies
who aren't really evil. The "stupid" part just kind of came out because I
think they would be dumb to spilt from BTI.
> Personally I actually prefer
> their "globular cockpit" design motif over anything that BT1 sets have to
> offer. Obviously their torsos and colour scheme aren't anywhere near as cool
> as BT1, but I think that their spaceships look fairly competent, like they
> "mean business" as much as any bad guys would.
Heck yeah. Though I like BTI a whole lot better, BTII does have some way
cool stuff. The Allied Avenger is one of my favorite sets in terms of design.
> > UFO: Stupider crap that should be left alone.
> > Insectoids: The stupidest crap of all Space, should definitely be left alone.
> >
> Gee, do I detect a pattern here? Just because some subthemes had sets that
> sucked, doesn't mean we should overlook them.
This may be just me, but when every single set in a subtheme sucks, I tend
to overlook it. Especially when the sets are also chock full o' SPUDs.
> Personally I really like the
> UFO 'figs. I'd prefer to just build my own decent UFO-style ships,
The thing is, though, that the figs would look extremely out of place with
decent ships seeing as that the figs themselves are not decent. They could
almost be robots with all the circuitry and equipment stapled to their space
suits. They have cool shoulder pads, though. I'll give them that much.
> And as for the Insectoids, hmm... strange how the poor quality of the sets
> has put people off from experimenting with the Insectoid concept.
I don't think so.. I tend not to mess too much with poor quality sets.
> You know,
> giant insects controlled by aliens. I'd rather like to see some MOCs like
> that... might even try one myself.
Yeah... It was a cool idea... but it bombed in my eyes due to the
hideousness (is that a word?) of the sets and the uselessness of the pieces.
Greg "Some day somebody else besides me will call me by my stage name. They
will call me Dr. Worm" Majewski
http://www.geocities.com/citrusx__/q.html
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Space Denominations
|
| Greg Majewski wrote in message ... (...) cool (...) design. (...) That's actually one of my favourite TLC ship designs too, possibly even my favourite! That, and the Rebel Hunter. (...) space (...) In that case, I'll admit that I don't like their (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Space Denominations
|
| Greg Majewski wrote in message ... (...) Well, if you think that the BT2 sets generally sucked (like I don't) then I could see how one would draw that conclusion. Personally I actually prefer their "globular cockpit" design motif over anything that (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.space)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|