Subject:
|
Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 May 2005 08:42:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2352 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.space, Jason J. Railton wrote:
| |
Another point on putting space train track on the edge of modules - it
becomes vitally important that you follow a strict six-wide rule on your
trains. i.e. not even half a plate of overhang is allowed for ladders or
handles. The trains must be able to squeeze through a six-wide gap.
|
Flibbity Floo. Any “system” that has such heavy restrictions on building
creativity sucks and should be abandoned. I mean really. Why bother with
incorporating “trains” at all?
JOHN
|
It’s not that hard to do you know, so long as you’ve grown out of
Duplo!
Only kidding. You don’t have to do any of that. It’s just if you want to
make big wide diesel-guzzling stacked intermodal space trains they’d be limited
to the periphery and inter-base travel. Smaller ones can serve the local
spaceman community’s intra-base transport needs.
Unless of course this is the start of a campaign for 64x64 moonbase modules with
5.333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 studs around the edges?
Jason Railton
(Space builders remember - Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads
to 8-wide trains)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
