Subject:
|
Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 May 2005 17:27:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2206 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Jason J. Railton wrote:
| |
Another point on putting space train track on the edge of modules - it
becomes vitally important that you follow a strict six-wide rule on your
trains. i.e. not even half a plate of overhang is allowed for ladders or
handles. The trains must be able to squeeze through a six-wide gap.
|
Flibbity Floo. Any “system” that has such heavy restrictions on building
creativity sucks and should be abandoned. I mean really. Why bother with
incorporating “trains” at all?
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
| (...) It's not that hard to do you know, so long as you've grown out of (URL) Duplo>! Only kidding. You don't have to do any of that. It's just if you want to make big wide diesel-guzzling stacked intermodal space trains they'd be limited to the (...) (19 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
| (...) Another point on putting space train track on the edge of modules - it becomes vitally important that you follow a strict six-wide rule on your trains. i.e. not even half a plate of overhang is allowed for ladders or handles. The trains must (...) (19 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
