Subject:
|
Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 May 2005 17:26:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2041 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Bram Lambrecht wrote:
> In lugnet.space, Daniel Rubin wrote:
> > Also, why does your standard allow the connection to be a plate below the
> > standard connection? Why not just require a standard connection?
>
> I think he means that the extra bits attached to the corridor assembly should
> not extend more than one plate below the corridor floor in order to keep the
> clearance for stuff passing underneath.
> --Bram
I see someone was replying at the same time as me!
I forgot to add that I think if you have one fixed permanent corridor, it should
be allowed to be supported from below however you want; this to allow a little
more creative freedom.
The preference though would be to keep your options open, so maybe having both a
permanent, supported corridor and another fixed closed-off face would be frowned
on and whispered about in secret until such time as the owner caves in and calls
it a 'module', but it wouldn't strictly be invalidated as a podule... ;-)
Jason Railton
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
| (...) I think he means that the extra bits attached to the corridor assembly should not extend more than one plate below the corridor floor in order to keep the clearance for stuff passing underneath. --Bram (19 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
