Subject:
|
Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 May 2005 16:56:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2038 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Daniel Rubin wrote:
> Also, why does your standard allow the connection to be a plate below the
> standard connection? Why not just require a standard connection?
I think he means that the extra bits attached to the corridor assembly should
not extend more than one plate below the corridor floor in order to keep the
clearance for stuff passing underneath.
--Bram
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
| (...) I see someone was replying at the same time as me! I forgot to add that I think if you have one fixed permanent corridor, it should be allowed to be supported from below however you want; this to allow a little more creative freedom. The (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
| (...) snip (...) Very nice. It looks pretty cool, and seems like it'd look even cooler in a moonbase module, especially clustered together. Why limit connections to just the 4 horizontal directions? I see a 3 dimensional array of spheres as (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
