Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase and monorail
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 15:49:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
393 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.space, David Wegmuller writes:
> Is this something some of you would be interested in?
This shows a lot of very clever thinking. The downside I see is that it is
quite consumptive of the 8 long track segments. HOWEVER, one can use the
track reverser as a standin for 2 short track segments.
Monorail stanchions came in 5 and 10 brick high versions. The 5 brick high
ones are typically used only for the midpoint of the ramp track. I agree
with Frank, 20 high is a good standard height to go with.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Moonbase and monorail
|
| (...) Well, use of station tracks in place of 2 short track segments is a little awkward. Remember, there is no "NOP" setting for them. The train either stops, or leaves the track section always going the same direction. One option which could be (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Moonbase and monorail
|
| Hi, I've been wondering if a monorail could be integrated within a moonbase without interfering with the corridors. I've played around with Track Designer and came up with a nice, modular geometry. The basic idea is to mount a 90 degree curve on a (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
20 Messages in This Thread: ![Moonbase and monorail -David Wegmuller (13-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Jon Palmer (13-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Duane Hess (13-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Markham Carroll (13-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Duane Hess (13-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Frank Filz (13-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Trains and moonbase (Was: Moonbase and monorail) -David Wegmuller (13-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Trains and moonbase (Was: Moonbase and monorail) -David Wegmuller (15-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Markham Carroll (13-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Larry Pieniazek (18-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Mark Rideout (14-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Paul Hartzog (18-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Frank Filz (13-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Paul Hanson (13-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Markham Carroll (13-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Anthony Babington (13-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Frank Filz (19-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Larry Pieniazek (20-Aug-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Moonbase and monorail -Patricia Van Dyke (9-Sep-02 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|