Subject:
|
Re: legends space set, my thoughts as to the reasoning based on what brad has said
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Mar 2002 21:22:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
854 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Matt Hein writes:
>
> I'd like to see a 6985 Cosmic Fleet Voyager, or a Message Intercepter Base
> or even the original 918 become a Space Legend! Why does Lego even continue
> to bother with those new SW sets?
I was weaned on Classic space, and I'll be extremely disappointed if Lego
abandons the SW line without producing an AT-AT and an Imperial Star Destroyer.
As much as I want a new 928, I want an AT-AT and ISD more.
> In my opinion, I think SW is getting kind of old.
The line is already ancient by recent standards, and I fear that it will get
the same treatment as other themes. Star Wars Lego brought me (and a lot of
other AFOLs) out of a very long dark age. I am not in favour of treating the
SW line the same as Rock Raiders or Slizers (a year or two, then *poof* gone).
> Of course, I'm sure most of .space wants to see a Space legend come sometime
> in the near future. How bad could releasing a Space Legend damage the SW
> line? I mean, come on! They don't sell Legends in stores anyway, so how
> could that affect the sales of the SW line?
I'm all for producing a classic space legend. That would be great. However,
I have to admit that the re-introduction of the Galaxy Explorer would
drastically diminish the likelyhood of me springing for a Blockade Runner
set. I would like to make my collection SW-complete, but my wallet is already
spread too thin with the sets currently in production.
Jeff J
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
