Subject:
|
Re: NQC 2.1 b2 in beta test
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:30:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1864 times
|
| |
|
|
(I didn't have time today to check with VC++ and VB as I intended.)
Dave Baum wrote:
> Assuming that VC++ is the defacto standard here, I think RcxCC should at
> least quote in a way that VC++ would handle correctly. No escaping isn't
> really an acceptable long-term solution, because even if I hack the
> CodeWarrior libs to do this, people will still have problems if they use
> VC++ to build NQC.
Mhm, I see. This makes sense. The behavior of VC++ still strikes me as odd, but
anyway if it's so, then your conclusion is obviously right, I'd say.
Uwe
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: NQC 2.1 b2 in beta test
|
| (...) My test was a program like this: #include <stdio.h> int main(int argc, char**argv) { int i; for(i=0; i<argc; ++i) printf("<%s>\n", argv[i]); } I built it under both Metrowerks and VC++. Then I called the program with various command lines to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
