Subject:
|
Re: NQC 2.1 b2 in beta test
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:36:30 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
donc@ANTISPAMcccd.edu
|
Viewed:
|
1425 times
|
| |
|
|
dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com (Dave Baum) wrote:
>
> I don't see any reason why you wouldn't be able to copy the beta version
> of NQC on top of the one RcxCC normally invokes.
>
> I suspect Mark will update RcxCC shortly after 2.1 becomes final.
The beta does not seem to work with RcxCC. All it does is display the
parameters for NQC and then exits. No compile.
---
DonC
donc@cccd.edu
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: NQC 2.1 b2 in beta test
|
| (...) Hmmm - the only reason I can think of for this would be if RcxCC is using one of the deprecated options that were removed in 2.1 (-o, -e, and -s which were replaced by -O, -E, and -S). If Mark can confirm which (if any) of these options are (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: NQC 2.1 b2 in beta test
|
| (...) that to (...) I don't see any reason why you wouldn't be able to copy the beta version of NQC on top of the one RcxCC normally invokes. I suspect Mark will update RcxCC shortly after 2.1 becomes final. Dave (24 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
