Subject:
|
Re: NQC wishlist
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Jan 2000 16:40:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2027 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <FntDnJ.JI8@lugnet.com>, "Vlad Dumitrescu"
<vladdu@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> *Another wish* (maybe was already suggested?): a more powerful macro facility.
> What I could use is the ## operator for textual concatenation...
Implementation of ## gets pretty nasty - at least within the current
pre-processor design. I'll look at the C spec again, but I'm pretty sure
## forces a re-tokenization. In the current design of NQC, tokenization
happens before pre-processing. I'm not sure how to force retokenization
with a flex based lexer. There are a few things I can try, but if its not
easy to implement its probably going to have to wait a while.
Dave
--
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: NQC wishlist
|
| (...) I believe the simplest way to do it would be to have an extra preprocessing pass... it will slow down compilation a little, it's true, but maybe not that much as to matter (compilation is anyway so much faster than the downloading anyway) then (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: NQC wishlist
|
| (...) I am sure more people than me are looking forward to that! About the "smaller" integer variables, I have put together a couple of macros that simulate an array of packed "small" integers, any bit size works, but power-of-2 sizes do not waste (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
