Subject:
|
Re: NQC wishlist
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Jan 2000 16:25:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1730 times
|
| |
|
|
Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, Dave Baum writes:
> > A switch statment will be added pretty soon.
Great!
> About the "smaller" integer variables, I have put together a couple of macros
> that simulate an array of packed "small" integers, any bit size works, but
Vlad, that's funny. Immediately after seeing Dave's reply, I decided to make such
macros myself. But I got disturbed and couldn't do it today anymore. Since you
seem to have done it already, I'll just wait to see yours :-)
> *Another wish* (maybe was already suggested?): a more powerful macro facility.
> What I could use is the ## operator for textual concatenation...
What exactly do you mean by this?
Uwe
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: NQC wishlist
|
| (...) I am sure more people than me are looking forward to that! About the "smaller" integer variables, I have put together a couple of macros that simulate an array of packed "small" integers, any bit size works, but power-of-2 sizes do not waste (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
