Results 1541 1560 of 2193.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
|
| range (score: 1.882) |
|
|
| range (score: 1.882) |
|
| | Re: Problems with NQC and math operations
|
| (...) Did you considered that the RCX has only integer variables. So, the allowed operation range is -32768 32767. If at any stage of your operation you exceed these limits, the result will be corrupted. For the use of sine and cosine with integer (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
| range (score: 1.882) |
|
| | light values?
|
| Another question before I call it a night- under LegOS 0.1.6, light-sensor values were restricted to the range 0-100. Under 0.1.7, I'm now getting a max value (pointed straight at a light bulb) of about 263, or once even 272. 255 would make sense to (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
| range (score: 1.882) |
|
| | light sensor problem?
|
| Ok, so i'm supposed to be the guru, but I don't get it: all my light sensors are currently showing a range of adjusted values between 60-310, instead of the 20-110 that I'm used to seeing. The sensor is in active mode (passive mode still shows (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
| range (score: 1.882) |
|
| | Power down time
|
| In The administrator section you can set the power down time - the time that the RCX will stay on, unattended. The range is 0-255 with 0 meaning always on, and the rest in minutes. No matter what time I choose, I can't make this work all the time. (...) (19 years ago, 16-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| |
| range (score: 1.882) |
|
|
| range (score: 1.882) |
|
| | Re: Radio Shack CDS cells in parallel
|
| (...) ----- True, but the RS CDS cells are cheap and using them in parallel or series also changes the response range, since all the resistances change with light levels. This would be most dramatic in the series connected case at the low resistance (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
| range (score: 1.882) |
|
| | Re: Multiple RCXs
|
| If the functions you wish to perform can be done in simple tasks you could probably program each RCX to recognize a specific range of message numbers. In this way, a 'function' on the RCXs can be 'invoked' by the PC by having it send a specific (...) (24 years ago, 12-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
| range (score: 1.882) |
|
| | Re: Problems with NQC and math operations
|
| Jeff, Your problem is with the 16 bit integer size that NQC uses. All integers are in the range -32768 to 32767. Using 10000 to simulate fixed point math operations is killing you. Everything works when you replace theta and D with constants because (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
| range (score: 1.882) |
|
| | Re: Syntax for reserving variables in NQC?
|
| Dave Baum schreef: (...) It looks perfectly logical to me. Will it be possible to reserve a range or do we need to reserve each location separately? No need for an extra keyword indeed. (It's hard enough already. Well I guess part of that comes from (...) (24 years ago, 28-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
| range (score: 1.881) |
|
| | Lightsensor
|
| Hi all, as a newbie I have a problem in the training center with my new 1.5 RIS. The lightsensor shows only a range of 37/47 in view-mode between black and white. (and so it doesn´t beep) Is this normal or due to a msfunction of the sensor ? Thomas (24 years ago, 25-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
| range (score: 1.881) |
|
| | more on the rotation sensor
|
| I did some more experiments last night. My conclusion is that the majority of apparent 2-state transitions never actually occur (that is: the sensor does not actually travel through 2 states between two consecutive sensor readings). The order of the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
| range (score: 1.881) |
|
| | Re: May I use RCX to play a .wav file?
|
| Thanks. Now I have converted wav file to mono data sampled at 11025Hz (can be changed) and sample range is 0-255 as below: 144, 150, 154, 156, 160, 159, 154, 149, 143, 134, 128, 120, 110, 103, 97, 93, 91, 93, 96, 102, 110, 120, 127, 138, 149, 156, (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
| range (score: 1.881) |
|
| | Re: reliability of quad speed LNP
|
| So with inverting every other message byte were you able to work at 4x? Were you then also able to work at close range at 4x? It would seem easy to patch LNP to automatically do this inversion. I'll have to give this a try. thanks, mark (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
| range (score: 1.881) |
|
| | Re: Light Sensor question
|
| (...) Sam, By default programming when you configure a sensor input to be a light sensor, it gives you back readings in the 0-100 range (i.e. percentage of the maximum possible reading). To get better resolution (which I expect you might want), you (...) (20 years ago, 15-Jul-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
| range (score: 1.881) |
|
| | Robolab Motor Settings - ATTN. Dick Swan
|
| Hello Dick, I am working with a professor at the University of Central Florida and we would like to use the Robolab software for several of our robotics classes. The one issue we see in doing that is that the motor settings in the software only (...) (19 years ago, 13-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| |
| range (score: 1.881) |
|
| | Re: Lightsensor
|
| (...) Hi Thomas facing the same problem since very few days (I'm also a nebie) it seems that this behaviour is 'normal'. However this is not satisfying at all because the sensors dynamic range is to low for reasonable applications. Is there someone (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
| range (score: 1.881) |
|
|
| range (score: 1.881) |
|
| | Re: How much memory finally?
|
| Here's the latest update. Hope we will get a clear picture of this #@$@ memory after all. The point is that the RCX processor can address 64k of memory, so let's divide this range into 4 equal area of 16k. (note:16k or 16384, in hex is 0x4000). (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
| range (score: 1.881) | More: Next Page >>
|