|
| |
|  
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
 | | Good news (Bad Rcx of ir transmitter)
|
| I have to share good news about my RCX and ir transmitter, I have tried just about every firmware that is available for download on the net. When using a tip from someone on the list I tried the Lego firmware 2.0 beta and got the ir transmitter anbd (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| | Re: Running IR in the background
|
| Hannes, Did you ever get any help with your question (below)? I'm trying to use the IR port on RCX along with light sensor (passive) as collision detection device. Having the same problems you're having. Clayton (...) (24 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| | Re: IR Proximity Detection Problem
|
| (...) A friend of mine attempted this setup a while back and came to the conclusion that he basically needed to be nearly perfectly perpendicular to the object he was trying to detect. So he decided this was way to precise/finicky for his general (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| | Re: IR Problems
|
| (...) Thank you for the excellent information concerning communication with more than one RCX. Last night in a dream I realized that I could just bypass communication placing two push button sensors where needed driving the additional RCX. The (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| | Re: IR Problems
|
| (...) tom@tomlohre.com Dear Claude, Thanks for your message. I have delayed in replying to the excellent advice concerning communication with more than one RCX. Last night in a dream I realized that I could just bypass communication placing two push (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| | Re: Listening to IR via NQC
|
| (...) Cool, that'd be great. What I'm looking for is: nqc -listen and then all IR messages sent by the RCX via SendMessage would get dumped, one per line, in decimal, to stdout. Additional parameters could make the format be comma-delimited, (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem
|
| chip 1138 / chip 1176 Strange... 38 + 38 = 76 What does that mean? Rob "Mark Riley" <markril@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Hn6xKJ.1o68@lugnet.com... (...) its (...) reflected (...) axle (...) same (...) post on (...) on (...) messages. (...) (...) (21 years ago, 23-Oct-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| | IR header how optional
|
| (...) Yep. But via our solid new reply framing code, thanks again, now I can see ... (...) Nope. At least not here: now that I look, I see my RCX often doesn't require the PC to send x 55:FF:00. IR command packets like x 10:FE 10:FE PBAliveOrNot and (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| | Bad Rcx's or bad ir
|
| I believe that i have a dead rcx, or a problem w/ the ir transmitter (doubtfull). I have a Lego Mindstorms Robotics Invention System 1.5, and have succesfully installed the firmware using the cd given along with the set. But when i try to download (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| | Re: IR Proximity Detection Problem
|
| Maybe the ambient light is too high ? in that case you can decrease visible light sensitivity as well as shielding detector from red LED light using this method : (URL) (only hope that this doesn't offend your "Lego purity" sense ;o) Philo (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| | FW: IR mode
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 6:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: IR mode (...) I wonder if these will work? ;---...--- ; IRMODE_HI ( -- ) M_CODE(9,``"IRMODE_H...HI,_SLINK) MOV.W (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| | FW: Ir transmission
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Monday, April 19, 1999 2:31 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: Ir transmission (...) Well, I don't do realtime stuff (until now), in fact what I do (simulation) is almost (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| | FW: Ir transmission
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Monday, April 19, 1999 6:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: Ir transmission (...) To answer the question, I would say do it as core (quicker download). I think we agree (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
|
| | FW: Ir transmission
|
| -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...ugnet.com] On Behalf Of John Cooper Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 6:07 AM To: lugnet.robotics.rcx....lugnet.com Subject: Re: Ir transmission (...) I can't get EMIT to work, (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.893)
|
