Subject:
|
Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Oct 2003 05:13:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4902 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx, Mark Riley wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics.rcx, Chris Masclet wrote:
> > In lugnet.robotics.rcx, Chris Masclet wrote:
> > > Hi I've got two RCX: a 1.5 and 2.0 version.
> > > I' ve got a problem with IR emiter/reicever.
> > > The 1.5 version seems to be more sensitive to reflected infrared and its
> > > good to use !
> > > But the 2.0 RCX is less sensitive and for example doesn't receive reflected
> > > message from my remote control or 1.5 RCX.It has to be exactly in the axle
> > > to receive IR.
> While the TSOP-1176 is also apparently sensitive to a 38KHz carrier (otherwise
> it couldn't receive normal RCX messages), it may be with less sensitivity than
> the native TSOP-1138. This could be the reason for the observed differences in
> IR reception between the different RCX versions.
>
> Mark
>
> BTW, the TSOP-1176 part is also used as the receiver in Spybots and Manas motor
> units.
OK thanks for your reply!
But the bad thing is that two RCX2.0 could not communicate properly....Am I
wrong??
Chris.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem
|
| (...) I think there might be an explanation for this and I've been meaning to post on this topic, but never seem to have gotten around to it! :-) I've opened up my RCX 1.0 and the IR receiver has the markings "TSOP 1138" on it. After looking this (...) (21 years ago, 23-Oct-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
