 | | Re: Hmm... install not going so smooth
|
|
Thanks for everyone's help. I just decided to install all the packages.... but now I have a different problem. I start to compile the cross compiler, and everything seems to be going fine.... except at the very very end. I get the following message: (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm... install not going so smooth
|
|
setup.exe Package Listing on cygwin.com will tell you that you need the libintl1 package. Probably dependencies for grep are incorrect, otherwise it would have been installed automatically. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Samuel Winchenbach" (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm... install not going so smooth
|
|
Samuel, Yes I have seen this error. I am guessing your install a couple of weeks ago was actually using B20 version of cygwin? or that you have reinstalled cygwin? I was moving things around and got this error along with some error dialog boxes (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Camera and legOS
|
|
1. the Vision Command Camera and writing software for the camera 2. interfacing your software with a legOS powered robot. 1. The Lego Vision Command is actually a Logitech USB camera repackaged inside some lego pieces. There is a [mostly inactive] (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Hmm... install not going so smooth
|
|
Hello, I decided to scrape my machine today and when I tried to reinstall legos I ran into a problem compling the cross compiler under cygwin. Here is a list of the packages I have installed: Cygwin Package Information Package Version ash 20020131-1 (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Freebsd 4.4 and legos
|
|
Ok i just started using freebsd and i was wondering if anyone could tell me what tools i need to install to make legos compile and run correctly. Thankx, Jason Hensler (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: More problems with floats
|
|
(...) It turns out to be the egcs 1.1.2 I compiled; the RPMs from sourceforge work fine. I'll try to find why my compiler was buggy... Thanks for your reply. Eric (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Camera and legOS
|
|
I wonder if anyone knows about the compability between legOS and the camera set named Vision command that are available for the Legorobot? Has anyone made any progress in trying to get it to work wíthin legOS? We are to guys at the University in (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: More problems with floats
|
|
(...) Eric, did you ever resolve this? If not, I could try to reproduce this... but I'd need two things: 1) the type of the return value of getVarVal 2) the type of the bool typedef Also, if you could run your cross compiler with the -v flag, that (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
There is stuff going on. But it isn't my highest priority at the moment :( (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
(...) cost) (...) Replying to my own post, Why not build our own? Glue together some bricks, hollow them out and put in one of these babys: (URL) something similar. The comunity could work out building instructions and develop our own add-ons. (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
(...) What might be doable and best is a documented bus extension (a card plug-in) slot. This could be taken to the extreme by making a cpu unit that just has power (plug-in option of course) and memory (expandable of course) and maybe the IR or (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
I'd be happy with a good "official" LEGO SONAR sensor and a fixed version of the LEGO Rotation Sensor (without the lost "clicks" bug) On the RCX side, I'd like a RCX 3.0 with 6+ sensor inputs and more outputs (and more RAM. I'm using MANAS sets to (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Converting a float to an integer
|
|
It looks like xdist and ydist are integers. You divide an integer by an integer, the answer is an integer. For example, if xdist=5 and ydist=10, you have 5/10, the answer is 0 (with a remainder of 5). So, if you do the multiply first, you will be (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Converting a float to an integer
|
|
I have built a plotter and want to draw a diagonal line of varying angles. It requires one motor to run slower then the other at a ratio based on the distance it has to travel compared to the other one. So I do something like this xspeed = (int) (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: A very Power Tool
|
|
(...) For all of the virus creators and senders out there: if there's one thing worse than a witless script kiddie, it's a scum-sucking virus propagator. Send all of the viruses to me that you want. They'll just go to my 10GB bit-bucket. Loosers... (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | A very Power Tool
|
|
Do NOT OPEN THE ATTACHMENT!! It is a virus. It has been making the rounds, it is the KLEZ virus. Thought you all might want to know. Tim Burt (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: [ANN] pbForth Version 2.1.3 Release
|
|
Thanks, it seems to work much better now. Very quick turn-around time, I appreciate that. You've done an excellent job putting this Forth together, thank you for your efforts. David (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
Oh, and I forgot one of the "BIGGEST" wishes on the list: 5) Linksys wireless access port response rather than the directional IR port. Or at least SOME form of 900MHz+ communication that is non-directional, with higher bandwidth (who knows...maybe (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
Seems to me that the BEST implementation of the RCX would be for some CORE changes and feature sets to be built in. I realize that these would be somewhat expensive, but I would pay pretty good money to have an RCX with the following specs (built (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
