Subject:
|
Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 May 2002 16:10:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3668 times
|
| |
|
|
There is stuff going on. But it isn't my highest priority
at the moment :(
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=17063
JB
> In lugnet.robotics.rcx, Lester Witter writes:
> > In lugnet.robotics.rcx, Jeff McClain writes:
> > > Seems to me that the BEST implementation of the RCX would be for some CORE
> > > for it...I'd pay it.
> > >
> > > Snip
> > >
> > > -Jeff McClain
> >
> > What might be doable and best is a documented bus extension (a card plug-in)
> > slot. This could be taken to the extreme by making a cpu unit that just has
> > power (plug-in option of course) and memory (expandable of course) and maybe
> > the IR or other serial connection (RS232 or USB or firewire). Everything else
> > is an add-on. And while we are dreaming, put a pentium in it running an
> > embedded linux (Pretty soon this will be doable both from engineering and • cost)
> >
> > Lester (Computer Geek) Witter
>
> Replying to my own post,
>
> Why not build our own? Glue together some bricks, hollow them out and put in
> one of these babys:
>
> http://www.uclinux.org/ucsimm/
>
> Or something similar. The comunity could work out building instructions and
> develop our own add-ons.
>
> Lester (Hardware Geek Wantabe) Witter
>
> (I know it is not that simple but what do you expect from a software winnie)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
| (...) cost) (...) Replying to my own post, Why not build our own? Glue together some bricks, hollow them out and put in one of these babys: (URL) something similar. The comunity could work out building instructions and develop our own add-ons. (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
