Subject:
|
Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 May 2002 15:21:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3545 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx, Jeff McClain writes:
> Seems to me that the BEST implementation of the RCX would be for some CORE
> for it...I'd pay it.
>
> Snip
>
> -Jeff McClain
What might be doable and best is a documented bus extension (a card plug-in)
slot. This could be taken to the extreme by making a cpu unit that just has
power (plug-in option of course) and memory (expandable of course) and maybe
the IR or other serial connection (RS232 or USB or firewire). Everything else
is an add-on. And while we are dreaming, put a pentium in it running an
embedded linux (Pretty soon this will be doable both from engineering and cost)
Lester (Computer Geek) Witter
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
| (...) cost) (...) Replying to my own post, Why not build our own? Glue together some bricks, hollow them out and put in one of these babys: (URL) something similar. The comunity could work out building instructions and develop our own add-ons. (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
| Seems to me that the BEST implementation of the RCX would be for some CORE changes and feature sets to be built in. I realize that these would be somewhat expensive, but I would pay pretty good money to have an RCX with the following specs (built (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
