 | | NQC 2.4 r3 released
|
|
This is just a bugfix from 2.4 r2. You can download from the usual place... (URL) Baum (23 years ago, 25-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Deleting Programs
|
|
post please "Nick Tarleton" <jp_prongs@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GsooKt.Ix4@lugnet.com... (...) out (...) (23 years ago, 25-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: can you use the old type 9v motor with an RCX?
|
|
I use this motor for a spindle motor to drive the cutter on my machines. Just ordered another for a new project. -- Bob Fay THE SHOP (URL) Wilson" <jonwil@tpgi.com.au> wrote in message news:3C9D9155.800000....com.au... (...) (23 years ago, 24-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: can you use the old type 9v motor with an RCX?
|
|
(...) Yes, you can use that motor with the RCX, but it draws significantly more current than the newer geared-down motors, so your batteries won't last as long. Dave (23 years ago, 24-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: can you use the old type 9v motor with an RCX?
|
|
(...) Yes, no problem, though it is generally less useful. Jürgen (23 years ago, 24-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | can you use the old type 9v motor with an RCX?
|
|
I am refering to the old type thats rectangular with 4x5 studs on top. (23 years ago, 24-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposals, Bug Fixes, etc and tracking them with SourceForge
|
|
I read over the proposed release changes for 0.2.6, just a few ideas. I recently picked up a second RCX and found it quite difficult to do development using legOS on two RCXs. I might just be missing something, but I had to maintain two seperate (...) (23 years ago, 24-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | is it possible to use a polarity switch with a RCX input?
|
|
Basicly, what I want is a button, switch or whatever on my model that when moved one way causes one input to be sent to the RCX but when moved differently it causes a different input to be sent to the RCX. Should also have a 3rd "off" state. I am (...) (23 years ago, 24-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposals, Bug Fixes, etc and tracking them with SourceForge
|
|
This looks good so far Stephen. I agree with the time-to-release remarks (although I love to dive in to new code 8-) Also, I like the idea of not updating to a new compiler (as I just got this machine setup and the compiler working well). I am (...) (23 years ago, 23-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Name suggestion
|
|
I think I suggested this before, but how about Leg-OS. This isn't easily confusable with Lego, and allows us to keep saying "leg os". mark (23 years ago, 23-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposals, Bug Fixes, etc and tracking them with SourceForge
|
|
And don't forget: We need a new NAME!!! There is no reference to legOS on the LEGO MINDSTORMS homepage. I understand their reason for this but it would be good for brickOS (formerly known as legOS) to get more popular. Mike (23 years ago, 23-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposals, Bug Fixes, etc and tracking them with SourceForge
|
|
(...) Here's my first cut at more detail. Thanks to a couple of you for providing some hint of your desired direction and for making my day by your showing of interest. I've more to add but you can get a feel for what I've been thinking to date. (...) (23 years ago, 23-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposals, Bug Fixes, etc and tracking them with SourceForge
|
|
I guess I should check the documentation on sourceforge as well, but I would like to know: What are the design goals for legOS at this point. By this, I mean, with the current set of people involved, what are the goals that everyone wants to work (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | egcs or something else?
|
|
(...) Actually, gcc 3.0.3-1 is available for the Hitachi. I'm running gcc with the new 2.12 binutils on my SuSE Linux machine without a flaw. Gcc only complains about some depricated styles at kernel compilation and has some problems with the c++ (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposals, Bug Fixes, etc and tracking them with SourceForge
|
|
I'm interested in helping out with legOS as well. So here's a brief write up of my applicable qualifications. ~7 years of C/C++ programming ~3 years of embeded C programming ~5 years of distributed programming (CORBA, RPC, RMI, homegrown stuff) (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposals, Bug Fixes, etc and tracking them with SourceForge
|
|
Well, I am definitely interested in participating! I am actively seeking developer status on sourceforge for the legOS project. I had concidered volunteering to coordinate the release, but had doubts/concerns about the time I would be able to put (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposals, Bug Fixes, etc and tracking them with SourceForge
|
|
Stephen, I am interested in helping out with the legOS project. I can contribute to the development on Windows OS and general project development and assitance. For some background on my experiences I have - BS and MS in Electrical Enginnering with (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Little Off Subject Was Re: Proposals, Bug Fixes, etc and tracking them with SourceForge
|
|
Mark, I am sadly guessing that Luis is mourning the loss of Duke to Indiana last night and thus has not responded. I hate to see a supportive and excited fan see their team loose. Ed (...) [snip] (...) [snip] (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposals, Bug Fixes, etc and tracking them with SourceForge
|
|
Mark, (...) I'm the Debian GNU/Linux Maintainer for legOS and am a current member of the sourceforge legOS project. I've been talking with Luis (albeit, given his response times it feels rather one sided [to be fair he said this would happen...] ;-) (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: RIS 2.0 or 1.5 (minimum requirements)
|
|
Sorry, I don't know if it will run on your system. I only installed it on one machine and hardly use it at all. Dave Baum (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
