To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 6535
6534  |  6536
Subject: 
Re: touch sensors aren't just switches (was Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 25 Aug 1999 02:54:36 GMT
Viewed: 
891 times
  
In lugnet.robotics, lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Tilman Sporkert) writes:
Many "buttons" in today's electronic devices are designed that way. Check
your TV remote control, your key-chain remote control for your garage door
opener or car alarm, the buttons on your phone etc. It eliminates the need
for a physical switch. All you need is a pair of copper pads under each
button. These are just part of the normal circuit board that you need
anyway. The rest is a hole in the cover, a piece of plastic ("the button"),
a spring, and a small piece of conductive rubber.

I think it also removes the need to eliminate "keybounce", the annoying thing
that happens with real switches due to dirt on the contact surfaces and tiny
arcs (sparks) just before initial contact.

Regardless, it seems to me that I'll do better making real switches. I was
planning on doing debouncing in software anyway (although I'd really rather
have gray coding in the multiplexer so I don't have to worry about that either
:-)

Anyway, thanks for your responses and good explanations.

- Robert Munafo                           http://www.mrob.com/
  LEGO: TC+++(8480) SW++ #+ S-- LS++ Hsp M+ A@ LM++ YB64m IC13



Message has 2 Replies:
  RE: touch sensors aren't just switches (was Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0
 
(...) The actual source of bounce is NOT the arc just before contact. It actually is the bouncing of the contact due to the action of the spring in the contact! Well, if you were switching a really high voltage through a small switch, you would get (...) (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
  Re: touch sensors aren't just switches (was Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0
 
(...) You can still get keybounce on rubber buttons. Perhaps there is a special design that would eliminate keybounce entirely, but in my experience some degree of debouncing is still required. I believe the transition is a more gradual one since (...) (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  RE: touch sensors aren't just switches (was Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0
 
(...) Many "buttons" in today's electronic devices are designed that way. Check your TV remote control, your key-chain remote control for your garage door opener or car alarm, the buttons on your phone etc. It eliminates the need for a physical (...) (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)

22 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR