Subject:
|
Re: touch sensors aren't just switches (was Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Aug 1999 02:54:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
891 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.robotics, lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Tilman Sporkert) writes:
> Many "buttons" in today's electronic devices are designed that way. Check
> your TV remote control, your key-chain remote control for your garage door
> opener or car alarm, the buttons on your phone etc. It eliminates the need
> for a physical switch. All you need is a pair of copper pads under each
> button. These are just part of the normal circuit board that you need
> anyway. The rest is a hole in the cover, a piece of plastic ("the button"),
> a spring, and a small piece of conductive rubber.
I think it also removes the need to eliminate "keybounce", the annoying thing
that happens with real switches due to dirt on the contact surfaces and tiny
arcs (sparks) just before initial contact.
Regardless, it seems to me that I'll do better making real switches. I was
planning on doing debouncing in software anyway (although I'd really rather
have gray coding in the multiplexer so I don't have to worry about that either
:-)
Anyway, thanks for your responses and good explanations.
- Robert Munafo http://www.mrob.com/
LEGO: TC+++(8480) SW++ #+ S-- LS++ Hsp M+ A@ LM++ YB64m IC13
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
22 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|