To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 6530
6529  |  6531
Subject: 
RE: touch sensors aren't just switches (was Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:51:06 GMT
Original-From: 
Tilman Sporkert <TILMAN@ACTIVESW.COMspamless>
Viewed: 
861 times
  
I wonder why LEGO designed the touch sensor that way and then made the
programming environment ignore it?

Many "buttons" in today's electronic devices are designed that way. Check
your TV remote control, your key-chain remote control for your garage door
opener or car alarm, the buttons on your phone etc. It eliminates the need
for a physical switch. All you need is a pair of copper pads under each
button. These are just part of the normal circuit board that you need
anyway. The rest is a hole in the cover, a piece of plastic ("the button"),
a spring, and a small piece of conductive rubber.

You can't use such a button for position measurements. The amount of travel
from first contact to full contact is very small, and the readings will
probably not be accurate or repeatable. You set it up to read "on" below a
certain resistance, and "off" above the trigger point.

--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics



Message has 2 Replies:
  RE: touch sensors aren't just switches (was Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0
 
(...) As you may guess, cost is the driving factor. In one project for a desk fan (it's the Brookstone Battery Operated Desk Fan in case you care) the rubber switch for three buttons and custom molding cost 8 cents! per switch in quantity 20,000. (...) (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
  Re: touch sensors aren't just switches (was Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0
 
(...) I think it also removes the need to eliminate "keybounce", the annoying thing that happens with real switches due to dirt on the contact surfaces and tiny arcs (sparks) just before initial contact. Regardless, it seems to me that I'll do (...) (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  touch sensors aren't just switches (was Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0
 
(...) Wow. That's pretty darn disappointing. I even bought extra touch sensors to use in multiplexed designs (but I haven't made the multiplexer yet). I guess I'll have to build some of my own touch sensors... I wonder why LEGO designed the touch (...) (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)

22 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR