Subject:
|
Re: Future Mindstorm Releases?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 20:31:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2798 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.robotics, Joe Strout wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, Wayne Gramlich wrote:
>
> > (Let me apologize in advance, this is going
> > to sound a bit like an advertisement.)
> >
> > My solution to the RCX problem was to
> > design my own extensible sensor and
> > effector suite that I call RoboBricks.
>
> (I note that it seems to be spelled RoboBrix by robotstore.com.)
The guy who sells them wanted a name that was
less likely to be kicked out by the trademark
examiner -- hence, RoboBRiX.
> > P.S. My boards are Lego-friendly in that they
> > have holes across the top and bottom that
> > snap right onto Lego studs.
>
> That's cool. I have several suggestions for you, as a potential user:
>
> 1. Get the robotstore folks to mention the LEGO compatibility in their
> descriptions; the one I looked at made no mention of it, and it's not obvious
> that that's what those holes are for.
Good point; I'll mention it to Roger (he's the Robot Store guy.)
> 2. Write a tutorial geared for LEGO users, showing how the RoboBrix modules can
> be used to control LEGO motors for example.
Documentation is a big problem. We need more
documentation everywhere. We need better
module documentation, a bunch of example
robots, etc.
> 3. Find some way to provide the RoboBrix boards in preassembled form. To
> require soldering makes it a big leap in difficult from Mindstorms.
I agree. We have to take one step at a time tho'.
-Wayne
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Future Mindstorm Releases?
|
| (...) (I note that it seems to be spelled RoboBrix by robotstore.com.) (...) That's cool. I have several suggestions for you, as a potential user: 1. Get the robotstore folks to mention the LEGO compatibility in their descriptions; the one I looked (...) (20 years ago, 1-Sep-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|