To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 22620
22619  |  22621
Subject: 
Re: challenge: LEGO copier
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:41:15 GMT
Viewed: 
1040 times
  
In article <I1xouE.LpJ@lugnet.com>,
Mark Tarrabain <markt@SPAMBLOCK.lynx.net> wrote:

Actually, he said "flat".  So I would assume that he meant an assortment
of bricks simply stuck to one baseplate, sort of like a mosaic.

No, I meant stuck to each other.

As for brick boundaries... I think the only thing you would need to
worry about is the boundaries where the colors differ.  As long as you
are allowed any configuration of bricks that produces the designated
color pattern, it should be very feasable (you could even design it to
optimize the number of bricks used, actually).

That's what I had in mind too.

And on the subject of
colors, the imprecise sensitivity of the LEGO light sensor could likely
not handle more than 3 colors in total, black, white, and some other
inbetween one.

I was assuming the use of a camera, not the LEGO light sensor.  But
using the light sensor is a clever idea.

This will almost certainly require more than 1 RCX though... I would
imagine there to be simply too many states to manage at the same time
for just 3 outputs.

Here I expose my complete cluelessness with regard to RCX.  Its three
outputs are what -- voltage levels?  Usually used to drive a motor
directly?  If so, does this mean that a robot needs one RCX per every
three degrees of freedom?

Thanks,
- Joe

,------------------------------------------------------------------.
|    Joseph J. Strout         Check out the Mac Web Directory:     |
|    joe@strout.net           http://www.macwebdir.com             |
`------------------------------------------------------------------'



Message has 4 Replies:
  Re: challenge: LEGO copier
 
Would the bricks be assembled as a wall one brick thick on its side? Like laying a cinderblock wall on its side then creating a copy? That might be done with an X-Y table arrangement with vice like sides at top and bottom of the bricks so that they (...) (20 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.robotics)
  Re: challenge: LEGO copier
 
(...) There are some clever tricks (diff & ratchet/clutch, muxes) to expand it somewhat for some applications, but in general, yes, a single RCX can drive only three independent pulse-width modulated polarity reversible 9V outputs. -SMQ Shawn (...) (20 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.robotics)
  Re: challenge: LEGO copier
 
(...) OK, just to clarify: assume an X-Y-Z space with studs sticking up in the Z direction. You mean a model that's only one stud thick in X, arbitrarily wide in Y, and arbitrarily high in Z? Yes, that would be a much simpler problem than what I was (...) (20 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.robotics)
  Re: challenge: LEGO copier
 
(...) Okay... I think I understand... so you use some 1xN plates or bricks on the top and the bottom of the whole "picture" to hold it together, and the actual construct built can be any size of width N? Or am I still way out there? >> Mark (20 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: challenge: LEGO copier
 
(...) Actually, he said "flat". So I would assume that he meant an assortment of bricks simply stuck to one baseplate, sort of like a mosaic. As for brick boundaries... I think the only thing you would need to worry about is the boundaries where the (...) (20 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.robotics)

22 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
8 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR