 | | Re: What is an RCX 2.0?
|
|
(...) These numbers (especially the Free Memory Left) are not significantly different from what I get from my RCX 1.0 brick. Hao-yang Wang (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | More juice out of the standard motors.
|
|
Hello I'm trying to make a robot go as fast as possible, but it seems that the power of the engines are stopping me. I own one RIS kit and nothing more. Can i add some more batteries or something? -- Magnus Fasting E-mail: pleboy@online.no Icq: (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
|
Tricky , Tricky, here's the dilly, 8 to 24 tooth makes the fastest, but low output power, try to find the proper combo so your motors don't work to hard, add a worm gear to hold off the back spin, then try some more gears to get the speed you need, (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Solenoid Pnuematic Valve
|
|
hey Jeff: Those pictures you sent me a while ago are still on my web site. they are @: (URL) I went and bought 2 of these valves just so I can try to "make" a 4 way valve. I have a crude proto type, and it sort-a fits in a 4x4 lego brick. sorry no (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego R/C etc
|
|
WOW ! Sounds like someone answered my prayers. #3 appeals to me. It sounds like just the thing to run the AI on a PC and remotely control the LEGO(R) Chassis. Would it be too much to ask for pics of the prototypes ? -Xanthra47 "John Barnes" (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
|
(...) Assuming the robot is being used self-powered (versus with AC adapter), would there be benefit in modifying the RCX to run off a single 9 volt versus all those AA's? That would save quite a bit of weight. :) Doing this wouldn't be "Lego pure" (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
|
(...) This would cause the weight to go down for acceleration, but then when you turned off the motors, you would coast a shorter distance due to your less inertia. It would depend if you were building a robot for pure acceleration, or not. It would (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
|
(...) In general terms, worm gears are less efficient than standard gears as they have more inherent friction - essentially, driving a worm gear is like pushing something up an inclined slope. How much this translates into a lego system I have no (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Lego R/C etc
|
|
erm... for LEGO purists, there's LEGO #8483 Technic CyberMaster ;) (a pBrick with RF PC control that provides a perfect Lego roverbot chassis) Check (URL) -----Original Message----- (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: W2K
|
|
I don't know of anybody who has successfully implemented the mindstorms sw on W2K, I worked at it for a while. I think RCXX Command Center works ok with W2K but can't be absolutely sure about that. phil -----Original Message----- From: Benjamin (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
|
I think the best solution is to use NO gears. Without the additional friction of the gears and axles through beams, the motors are surprisingly powerful. I have had very good experience with direct drive robots. I suggest that you experiment with (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Off topic
|
|
On the same off topic line. Is there a list for us electronics wanna be’s somewhere? phil -----Original Message----- From: Schaaf John [mailto:JSchaaf@wyseadv.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 2:00 PM To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com Subject: Off topic (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Vision Command Nightmare (long post)
|
|
I recently purchased Vision Command from Target.Com. I own an aging machine (p-233, 64 ram, win ME) but one that stil suits my needs. Running Windows ME I thought that using USB devices would be no problem. I went through the install process, and (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Vision Command Nightmare (long post)
|
|
"Mike Broam" <cybrid26@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GA5t9E.68A@lugnet.com... (...) machine ---...---snip---...--- I had no problems with VC at all (great software and camera for the price), two of my buddies bought and installed one, also with (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
|
(...) The original supplicant wanted to use rotation sensors - so I guess direct drive is out. I guess you can use an axle extender and use the sensor as a bearing - but you won't get a very precise position reading if you can only sense position (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Vision Command Nightmare (long post)
|
|
David (and all), I don't blame lego for the problem. But I have my computer so tweaked (mostly to run varying simulations) that sometimes new software can through it out of wack. Perhaps when I get a new computer I will get VC again (hey Brickbay is (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
|
(...) if there's enough space around you can add the rotation sensor on an auxiliary axle with an 8t gear, and an 24t gear on the direct drive axle. best, yaco\ (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | BrickBots.Com Contests Extended - Balancing a Pendulum is HARD!
|
|
Hi Folks, I have decided to extend the current contest (Top Spinning and Inverted Pendulum Balancing) at BrickBots.Com for two more weeks. The top spinning contest had one entry during the original timeframe, and a great one at that! You can see (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Vision Command Nightmare (long post)
|
|
(...) I brought my VC camera into work to use as a webcam last week. I've yet to get it to work. I had it working fine at home on a PII system, but something about this ABIT TX5 board just gives me a black screen. I also tried the "Fix it" button, (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickBots.Com Contests Extended - Balancing a Pendulum is HARD!
|
|
Hi Richard, There has been an inverted pendulum balancer done using RCX and legos before. Here is a link to one of these projects (made by the author of the biped1 robot): (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
