Subject:
|
Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Mar 2001 01:34:48 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Steve Baker <sjbaker1@airmail.net/IHateSpam/>
|
Reply-To:
|
{sjbaker1@airmail}StopSpammers{.net}
|
Viewed:
|
733 times
|
| |
|
|
Gustav Jansson wrote:
>
> I think the best solution is to use NO gears. Without the additional
> friction of the gears and axles through beams, the motors are surprisingly
> powerful. I have had very good experience with direct drive robots. I
> suggest that you experiment with different wheel sizes until you get the
> right power to speed that you need.
The original supplicant wanted to use rotation sensors - so I guess direct
drive is out. I guess you can use an axle extender and use the sensor as
a bearing - but you won't get a very precise position reading if you can
only sense position accurate to 1/16th of a wheel rotation. I generally
want to gear up the rotation sensor so it rotates faster than the wheels.
--
Steve Baker HomeEmail: <sjbaker1@airmail.net>
WorkEmail: <sjbaker@link.com>
HomePage : http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
Projects : http://plib.sourceforge.net
http://tuxaqfh.sourceforge.net
http://tuxkart.sourceforge.net
http://prettypoly.sourceforge.net
http://freeglut.sourceforge.net
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
| I think the best solution is to use NO gears. Without the additional friction of the gears and axles through beams, the motors are surprisingly powerful. I have had very good experience with direct drive robots. I suggest that you experiment with (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
