 | | pbForth and USB Tower
|
|
Just a quick note to ask how many people are waiting on USB support for the pbForth language. I got a USB tower a couple of weeks ago and just got it working with my uploader/console last night. It uses ODD parity, so the next pbForth release will (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
|
 | | USB 1 with Handyboard.
|
|
I am a member of CAD CAM EDM DRO group on Yahoo There is an ongoing dicussion about developing a black box for controlling Hobby CNC machines. Currently machines are controlled by the LPT printer port. This has two disadvantages 1) PC are always (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
|
 | | Re: problems using arrays in NQC
|
|
wow, I tried what you said and it worked flawlessly. I feel kinda stupid for not having thought of that for so long. thanks. aatish aatish@mac.com "Alexander Cech" <alexander.cech@chel..._this_.at> wrote in message news:GtMKMo.H79@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
 | | Re: problems using arrays in NQC
|
|
Hi, you have to tell BricxCC/NQC that you are compiling for the RIS 2.0 firmware. To do this, select "RCX2" in the "Searching for the brick" window that appears at startup (you can also make this the default value in Preferences>Startup). (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
 | | problems using arrays in NQC
|
|
hi I'm building a lego turing machine and in the code certain data values need to be taken into an integer array. (sepcifically, inputing a binary no. using light sensor and a stack of yellow and black bricks). However, the program didn't compile (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
 | | Re: RCX as a PGP engine
|
|
I posted this msg. about 10 days ago but as my server was set up wrong it didn't work. sorry for the delay. At the time of posting this i have already seen the movie thrice so I'm about ready. I've recently (a month ago) created a RSA (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: RFC: smaller task scheduler
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Joseph Woolley writes: <snip> (...) <snip> Ok, so I was wrong about this. I double checked the standard task scheduler, and sure enough, it cycles through the high priority tasks, until all are P_WAITING, then moves (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | max 232 ???
|
|
I,m in the begining stages od building my handyboard kit. But I seem to be having trouble with the charger card. It was while doing the testing for the max232 serial ic. At first all the test seemed to do okay. Pin#2 was at 9.6v, pin#6 was at -9.7v. (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
|
 | | RE: Vision Command on XP?
|
|
I got the camera to work by downloading the latest drivers from Logitech. I haven't tried to get the Lego software working with it yet. -----Original Message----- From: Julian Gomez [mailto:jeg@polished...ixels.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Vision Command on XP?
|
|
Has anyone been able to get Vision Command working on XP? -- What about background checks for politicians? Dr. Julian "a tribble took it" Gomez mailto:jeg@polished-pixels.com ** (URL) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Need help with NQC
|
|
I just wrote a program and I can't get it to work. I download it to the RCX and it just runs its motors. I look at the display and push on the bumper and it has those little triagles. So it is not hardware because the RCX reads that the bumper in (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
 | | Re: IC4.0 and library files
|
|
Sam & Victor, Thanks for the prompt replies. I was led astray by the fact that I got a graphic image when I first opened that file (lib_hb_exp.ic). Once I 'cancelled' the image, the needed file text was there. Once again, thanks to the group. John (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
|
 | | Scout programming
|
|
I used BricXCC and the USB tower to program the Scout. I was wondering how the programming was done by NQC. Are the Scout and RCX command sets compatible? How so? Or does NQC translate and assemble differently depending on target brick? There are (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
 | | Re: IC4.0 and library files
|
|
Hi John. There's another file that does it... I think it's an .IC file, but not sure. Since I'm at work, I can't check (No IC), but I found it simply by opening up various .IC files in the Handyboard directory. Eventually I came across a file that (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
|
 | | IC4.0 and library files
|
|
I've been experimenting with Interactive C 4.0 and have run into a problem. I am unable to modify the list of files which are downloaded when IC4.0 is initialized. With IC3.2, I simply modify the lib_hb.lis file. With IC4.0, modifying 4.0's (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
|
 | | Re: Final RFC on next legOS release (would have been legOS 0.2.6)
|
|
Concerning the name change, call for ideas and a vote, I would suggest that a NEW thread entitled similar to "Call for legOS name change" be created in lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos. The details when worked out and as outlined in the rlswork doc should (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: RFC: smaller task scheduler
|
|
"Stephen M Moraco" <stephen_moraco@agilent.com> wrote in message news:GtKIM4.Gws@lugnet.com... (...) <snip> (...) Sounds good. Now, who would like to provide a second opinion? BTW, as far as intended purpose of the task scheduler... I can see how (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: is it possible to use a polarity switch with a RCX input?
|
|
(...) full (...) 100 (...) handy. (...) two (...) I'm not very familiar with electronics, but I am wondering whether the combination of two diodes with a resistor could solve the problem. I mean this: when current flows in a certain direction, it (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
|
 | | Re: Deleting Programs
|
|
That would be great. Thanks Mark! Obviously, it will be prudent to make some or all of these optional at compile time... but I believe at least half of them are useful for most users. Anyone have an idea of priority on this addition? Should it be (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: RFC: smaller task scheduler
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Joseph Woolley writes: <snip> (...) This is exciting... <snip> (...) Good work on this! Since you have the config and simple swap we'll need to prove that both versions are still working and I'd like a 2nd opinion (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|