To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.publish.photographyOpen lugnet.publish.photography in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Publishing / Photography / 226
225  |  227
Subject: 
Re: taking good photos
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography
Followup-To: 
lugnet.publish.photography
Date: 
Wed, 21 May 2003 06:29:36 GMT
Viewed: 
50 times
  
In lugnet.space, Todd Lehman writes:
For example, suppose you have a 10-bit CCD (common), 10x digital zoom,
and 5x optical zoom.  Now if you take a 24-bit color JPEG photo at 10x
(digital zoom), download it from the camera, load it into Photoshop, convert
it to a 16-bit image, and resize the image to 50% (half size), that _should_
         ^^^^^^
Err, I mean a 48-bit image (16 bits per channel)

contain more detail than if you had just taken the photo at 5x (optical zoom).
If they look identical, then the camera has a really poor digital zoom.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: taking good photos
 
(...) I don't think that's quite correct. If your CCD or CMOS chip has greater than 8 bits of depth on each spectral band (most do), then an on-camera digital zoom should contain more information than a post-processed zoom. For example, suppose you (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)

22 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR