 | | Re: need camera advice.
|
|
Now, wait a minute. Not everybody can get $400 cameras for Christmas, and not everybody can afford to spend an extra $200 or $300, The camera costs about $100, but the reviews I found are great, they say that it's 'good for it's price.' 1.3 (...) (23 years ago, 26-Dec-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: need camera advice.
|
|
(...) Jonathan: Honestly dude? Return it... trade up to at least a 3.3, otherwise you probably won't be happy with the quality. 3.3's are going for like $299 now and usually come with 2x optical zzom, and at least 6x digital xoom. I have a Sony, but (...) (23 years ago, 25-Dec-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | need camera advice.
|
|
I just got a new digital camera for XMAS. Its a Concord EYEQ Duo LCD. It says its 1.3 megapixels, 2x digital zoom, 9.9mm f/3.2 It doesnt have an optical zoom on it at all. Has anyone used this camera before, does anyone have any advice on using it (...) (23 years ago, 25-Dec-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographer etiquette questionnaire/survey
|
|
(...) I thought I might expand on this a little. I used to participate in ancient miniatures tournaments at the local gaming convention. This was long before Games Workshop - which may have funky rules, but have raised the standard of painting (...) (23 years ago, 25-Dec-02, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographer etiquette questionnaire/survey
|
|
(...) Yes. If you aren't you probably shouldn't be displaying your work. If someone wanted to get in tight with a macro lens, it would be nice to ask permission first, however. (...) Yes. No (well, condition noted above, but that's because of close (...) (23 years ago, 25-Dec-02, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Last Call For BricksWest 2003 Presenters/Sessions
|
|
The organizing committee is attempting to finalize the BricksWest schedule by the end of next week. This is the absolute last chance for you to step forward and volunteer to run a session or two in Carlsbad. To date, we are a bit heavy on trains, (...) (23 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest, lugnet.general, lugnet.town, lugnet.space, lugnet.storage, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.castle, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.build.mecha) !
|
| |
| | Re: Easy starfield, planet and star recipe
|
|
(...) Thanks, Gil! It's my pleasure to share this with everyone and help get the creative juices flowing and gather input to improve my techniques. I'll try to keep the info coming. I know I'd like to go over how to make a canyonesque planet but I (...) (24 years ago, 21-Sep-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Easy starfield, planet and star recipe
|
|
(...) One of the controls you can also use is the sphereize filter in the Distort menu. That will allow you to create or drop in a scan of a continent and stuff. From there you define a circular area (Shift circle to get a perfect circle)and then (...) (24 years ago, 21-Sep-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Easy starfield, planet and star recipe
|
|
Clouds are tricky. I haven’t figured out the best way to render them yet, but take a look at this pic: (URL) that type of “cracked and craggy” planet is a lesson by itself—I’ll get to that in another post. Anyway, for those clouds, what I did was: (...) (24 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Easy starfield, planet and star recipe
|
|
(...) etc. In the past, to make those sorts of things, Ive used the 'render clouds', then distorted the image in various ways. Of course that always entails ugly amounts of work since the cloud rendering always has that same sparse fractal dimension (...) (24 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Easy starfield, planet and star recipe
|
|
(...) Actually my "more accurate rendering" was done with pencil and paper. I suppose I could scan it. As for astronomical accuracy, I just thought somewhere in the back of my mind that the lit spot on the planet was somehow different from the way (...) (24 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Easy starfield, planet and star recipe
|
|
Actually Dan, I've been taking the Jassim Starfield (and Galaxy) tutorial and have been more than pleased with the resulting galactic backdrops. It's saved me scouring the 'Net and stealing other people's images. Thanks kindly, Teach! Cheers, -G (...) (24 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Easy starfield, planet and star recipe
|
|
(...) Thank you for your suggestions. I was trying to keep this recipe as basic as possible--sort of an intro for those who haven't tried this. Thus, that particular picture was not an exercise in astronomical accuracy but more for simply using the (...) (24 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Easy starfield, planet and star recipe
|
|
In lugnet.space, Daniel Jassim writes: ... (...) . . . (...) looks wrong. The lit spot is too small, unless the star is tiny, and practically on top of the planet. Perhaps you need to drag the gradient circle just a bit further if you start at the (...) (24 years ago, 19-Sep-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Easy starfield, planet and star recipe
|
|
Greetings! Here's a simple starfield recipe for Photoshop: - Make a new document, 720 X 480 pixels, 300 dpi, Mode: Grayscale - Go to your Tool Palette and grab your Paint Bucket tool and fill the canvas with black - Go to Filter, then Texture, then (...) (24 years ago, 19-Sep-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: photoing legos
|
|
(...) I've had some success with using very dark backgrounds, and letting the camera make adjustments. I have a picture of three images of the same largely black thing, using the same lighting, at (URL) with a off-white background, a navy blue (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographer etiquette questionnaire/survey
|
|
From the tone of Todd's replies, it sounds like he knows how to photograph Lego bricks. This is good, I need to talk to you at BrickFest, Todd. My attemtps to document my creations photographically with the inevitable digital camera have been (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographer etiquette questionnaire/survey
|
|
My opinions have largely been stated already, but... (...) Yes. (...) No. (...) Fine. (...) Are you looking at discomfort when flashed in my eyes or damage to the brick due to repeat strobe exposure? I hate being "flashed" unexpectedly. And I doubt (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographer etiquette questionnaire/survey
|
|
Todd, As you can see from my Brickshelf directory from last years' Brickfest ( (URL) ) I took alot of pictures at the event. I tried to get every model, but I'm sure that I missed some. I also tried to take pictures of as many of the attendees and (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
