 | | Re: Some Questions...
|
|
(...) It's crucial if you're taking pics of your MOCs. (...) I don't know for sure, but I would expect any camera >1.0Mp would have a macro mode. When I tried out the Canon A20 (2.1Mp) I could only get within about one foot of the subject, WITH (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
Daniel Siskind wrote: <snip> I'm not sure I'm ready to take as drastic a step as Dan, but I have to say his words resonate with me. PLEASE document the guidelines for acceptable pictures. Frank (23 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) nice reference i wonder if anyone gets it -paul (23 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
Due to the recent events on Brickshelf, I have decided to permanently withdraw my Brickshelf gallery postings and I will be removing the links from my web site. My reason for this are as follows: 1. While Kevin Loch may OWN Bickshelf, the content is (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Some Questions...
|
|
(...) How importent is macro? And what is the cheapest camera that has it? What do you think is the 'average' closest focus? (without macro) (...) Well, the sale I have is online. :-/ (...) Argus makes a few digicams. (URL) retail price for the (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Some Questions...
|
|
(...) I bought my first digital camera in March, and I've never heard of Argus. Kodak made a model called the DC3200, but it was only 1.0 megapixel, and Kodaks don't seem to get the best reviews. This site (that I heard about here on Lugnet) is (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Some Questions...
|
|
Can somebody show me an example of a 1.3 megapixel picture? Is 1.3 MP acceptable? Does less resolution = less quality? Does anybody have, or have used an Argus 1.3 megapixel DC3200 digicam?If so, can you review it? Thanks for your time, -JHK (23 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 Brickshelf Questions + 1 more
|
|
(...) (3) Is there, in the pipeline, a function to move a folder without losing the folder hit counts? I'd like to add some hierarchies to make my gallery easier to navigate, but shudder at the idea of losing the histories ... Sorry to reply to my (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | 2 Brickshelf Questions
|
|
Hi Kevin et. al. 2 quick Brickeshelf-related questions: (1) I notice that the counters aren't increasing anymore - is that something that is going to be reinstated once all of the folders are cleared? (2) Is there any way to change one's password? (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Trusted Users (was Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question)
|
|
(...) Sure, I'd even pay $10 to help Kevin out with the site and to have trusted user status. I'm very interested in seeing a solution to this. Brickshelf is a great (free) resource and I applaud Kevin for it. I understand totally his potential (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Trusted Users (was Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question)
|
|
(...) Agreed. The way I see it (if I may be so bold to suggest this) We all pay $10 (or whatever). Kevin gets money to help run the site and whatnot, and we get to be moderation-free and instant-uploady. Now, of course, if someone directs Kevin to (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Trusted Users (was Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question)
|
|
Lindsay & All, (...) I would not mind paying that as well. It would help Kevin and others out. (...) Well, I agree to some extent, I think it is bad when people upload things that have to be monitored. However, some of these monitoring issues are (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Trusted Users (was Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question)
|
|
(...) Just as a note, folks - this is what currently is (at least for current content; I'm not sure about new). Most of my folders are unmoderated, but they're still quite viewable on my webpages here: (URL) "view now and moderate later" is (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Trusted Users (was Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question)
|
|
(...) Likewise. I'd also be happy to pay a small fee to ensure that status-- I'd bet that those who seek to use the site to post idiocy and offensive things would be unwilling to put any amount of money where their mouths are. Nothing too crazy, (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Trusted Users (was Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question)
|
|
(...) I wholeheartedly second this, Chris, Kevin, and all. Tim Courtney (23 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Trusted Users (was Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question)
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Ditto (...) Forgive me if I stray into the fantastic side of things for a minute - I'm not a computer buff. How about cross referencing Brickshelf and Lugnet so that those with Lugnet memberships are trusted users? That would (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Trusted Users (was Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question)
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Kevin Loch writes: <snippage> (...) Kevin, while I understand why the moderation takes place, and can imagine how frustrating it is to you, let me reiterate points that John Barnes and Lar (among others?) raised. I would (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question
|
|
(...) You might have a point. This has suddenly become a full time activity, and is taking alot of time away from other (paying) work. Maybe I should just shut the gallery down to save everyone the trouble of fussing over what's on-topic and allow (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question
|
|
Frank & All, (...) Indeed. (...) I can understand why it is needed, but it is frustrating sometimes. (...) Indeed. I think someone (or several examples) of porn related items, I saw a few of them from time to time, and Kevin decided to make this (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question
|
|
(...) It sounds like we really need a good policy description of what is and is not allowed. I was under the impression that in the past, at least small amounts of personal stuff were allowed (as they help illustrate the person who's LEGO or geeky (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
