Subject:
|
Re: Coolest Brickshelf account
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.people
|
Date:
|
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:51:33 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
6263 times
|
| |
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lar(at@at)miltontrainworks(dot.dot)com> wrote in message
news:IIFu1u.12Kq@lugnet.com...
> XFUT lugnet.people
>
> In lugnet.build, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > In lugnet.build, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > > In lugnet.build, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > > > In lugnet.build, Stefan Garcia wrote:
> > > > > I believe there was some fuss about it a while ago, and rightly so.
> > > >
> > > > Agreed! And I believe John was the one making a lot of the fuss ;)
> > > >
> > > > http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dat/models/?n=2109
> > > > http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=12263
> > >
> > > Is there something wrong with that?
> >
> > No.
>
> Good!
>
> > > Are you mocking John for being happy that
> > > someone else is creating and wanting others to be aware of it so they
> > > can be
> > > happy too?
>
> > No.
>
> Good again, that's great. However... You snipped the most important part
> of the
> post, the point I was trying to make:
>
> > > There seem to be some that think that mentioning that something is
> > > worthy of mention or notice is something to belittle or ridicule.
> > > I just don't get that. Seems petty to me to harp on other people
> > > being happy for creators.
>
> Do you deny that there do seem to be some people that seem to think that
> way?
>
> Do you deny that it's a petty view to take, or that it could be perceived
> as
> petty?
>
> > > It sure reads like you're mocking him to me.
> >
> > Well you read it wrong.
>
> K, great! I'm really glad that wasn't your intent this time!
>
> But do you deny that it *could* be read that way? Have you ever mocked
> anyone in
> the past? Have you ever mocked John?
>
> If so, wouldn't it be reasonable to hypothesise that perhaps you were
> mocking
> this time too and evaluate the words on that basis, and if they fit that
> interpretation, conclude that you actually were?
>
> > And I don't see what it has to do with you anyway.
>
> What does the thread "have to do" with you either? My comment in the
> thread is
> just as valid as yours.
Please tell us, oh God of tactful posts, how to please all the Lugnetters
all the time with such poise and gracefulness as to *never* come off as
being gruff, tactless, rude, crude, obnoxiuos, or other. We humble servants
obviously lack the ability to post intellegently like the great pillars of
the community like (insert your name here). May he/she have mercy on our
poor souls and show us the light and the err in our ways...
And... to keep this on topic - [JOHN], thanks for pointing out that
Brickshelf account, albeit old or new or renewed or whatever; I thoroughly
enjoyed seeing those renders [again].
I'm not setting o-t on this one, there's a fine line between .debate and
.fun. I'd much rather everyone saw the fun side all the time. Remember,
we're [mostly] adults here talking about plastic toys...
Rob
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Coolest Brickshelf account
|
| (...) Ha, if you're talking to me (which I hope you're not) you've got me confused with someone else, tactful posting is not one of my core competencies, sorry. (...) That's not possible. But it's possible to be nice instead of mocking. (...) Let me (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jun-05, to lugnet.people)
|
Message is in Reply To:
56 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
