To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.peopleOpen lugnet.people in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 People / 4419
4418  |  4420
Subject: 
Re: Coolest Brickshelf account
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.people
Date: 
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:09:14 GMT
Highlighted: 
!! (details)
Viewed: 
13252 times
  
In lugnet.build, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> XFUT lugnet.people
> 
> In lugnet.build, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > In lugnet.build, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > > In lugnet.build, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > > > In lugnet.build, Stefan Garcia wrote:
> > > > > I believe there was some fuss about it a while ago, and rightly so.
> > > > 
> > > > Agreed! And I believe John was the one making a lot of the fuss ;)
> > > > 
> > > > http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dat/models/?n=2109
> > > > http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=12263
> > > 
> > > Is there something wrong with that?
> > 
> > No.
> 
> Good!
> 
> > > Are you mocking John for being happy that
> > > someone else is creating and wanting others to be aware of it so they can be
> > > happy too?
> 
> > No.
> 
> Good again, that's great. However... You snipped the most important part of the
> post, the point I was trying to make:
> 
> > > There seem to be some that think that mentioning that something is
> > > worthy of mention or notice is something to belittle or ridicule.
> > > I just don't get that. Seems petty to me to harp on other people
> > > being happy for creators.
> 
> Do you deny that there do seem to be some people that seem to think that way?
> 
> Do you deny that it's a petty view to take, or that it could be perceived as
> petty?
> 
> > > It sure reads like you're mocking him to me.
> > 
> > Well you read it wrong.
> 
> K, great! I'm really glad that wasn't your intent this time!
> 
> But do you deny that it *could* be read that way? Have you ever mocked anyone in
> the past? Have you ever mocked John?
> 
> If so, wouldn't it be reasonable to hypothesise that perhaps you were mocking
> this time too and evaluate the words on that basis, and if they fit that
> interpretation, conclude that you actually were?
> 
> > And I don't see what it has to do with you anyway.
> 
> What does the thread "have to do" with you either? My comment in the thread is
> just as valid as yours.

Isn't LUGNET a great place?!?  The bully returneth.

Larry, I see no value added in your posts, except to make sure the fight that
you are trying to promote gets started.

This thread is now off topic.  Please take it someplace else.

Kevin

















































-



Message has 1 Reply:
  (canceled)
 

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Coolest Brickshelf account
 
XFUT lugnet.people (...) Good! (...) Good again, that's great. However... You snipped the most important part of the post, the point I was trying to make: (...) Do you deny that there do seem to be some people that seem to think that way? Do you (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.space, lugnet.people)

56 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR