|
|
 | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) Benjamin, All I am doing is stating my view. You may/may not like my view, but I'm sure you will agree that I'm entitled to it. I suppose the alternative would be for admins to highlight threads as "closed"? FUT: lugnet.off-topic.debate Scott (...) (24 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) Obviously you dont. I did have to explain myself several times over
And hes got as much a right to post as you do Ben. Just cause youve already said your points dozent mean everyone else has to walk away. Try not to dictate to others so (...) (24 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) Ummmh...Scott...we know already...subject matter should be already closed... thanks...don't open another can of worms... Benjamin Medinets (24 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) People who spotlight messages should think carefully about the type of posts they think are appropriate for the LUGNET shop window: ie "Top Stories" on www.lugnet.com Although Tim is well meaning, I really doubt his melodramatics belong there. (...) (24 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | |  | | A Request
|
| Hello, I have been a part of the online Lego community since June of 1998. But I think it's time to call it quits. I would like to request that anybody and everybody who has my name, e-mail address, creations, original documents, and/or website (...) (24 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, lugnet.people)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) I guess that means the conversation is over, the admin thinks it's noise. Jude FUT o-t.debate (24 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) [...] (...) Thank-you, Bram. My thoughts exactly... -Suz (24 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general) !!
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) Well, I for one never would have seen that thread had someone not highlighted it. Seems to me the waste is someone wasting bandwidth complaining about someone wasting bandwidth. [1] -John [1] Unless it's someone posting that someone is wasting (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) Definitely. Spyder has nothing to back those words up with, and Tim was a great guy who was only trying to better Lugnet. A word of advice to Spyder. Please think before you post. You'd be amazed what some people do before thinking, and some (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) Hey Spider, I think you missed the point... yes people do come and go all the time, BUT... Tim wasn't "just another user"... he had passion not only for making the Lego Community a better place, but also LUGNET. Its your attitude and others (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| Interesting how you presume to talk on his behalf
And all the others who posted
Anyway
(...) That's all well and good. For you can e-mail him as much as you want, you can leave as many happy-goodbye messages in the .peoples section as you wish, (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) As someone who HAS taken a break I can say that it can be quite a good thing, in that it recharges your batteries a bit. It can also remind you that LUGNET is more than just one person, even yourself, because the discussion goes on without you (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| I hope that is all it is, I would rather he just take a break than sour over time. (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) Definitely. What is happening to Lugnet anyway? (...) Hmm...The community should really think about this. What exactly Is Lugnet and why was it instated? I'll tell you. Lugnet is the medium for Lego fans like you and me to discuss matters (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | |  | | RE: On Hiatus
|
| (...) IMO, the problem is that people seem to think the noise is more important than the content. To me, the content on LUGNET is the MOCs and the related building discussion. Noise is people bickering about why they can't get along...which leads to (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) Jim, I know Tim well enough to say that it is not the name change that brought him to this decision, it was just the last straw of a long complex chain of events. It isn't that he can't handle negativity or criticism. It is that over a long (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| If this is about the name change , it is best that you do take a break. While I feel it was a little out of line for you to ask,(if that indeed is what this is all about) you did it in the nicest possible way. It also got blown out of proportion by (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| I'll admit I'm feeling like some others here do. Tim has always played an important role here on Lugnet but, a partial quote, "Lugnet is a somewhat compartamentalized RTL". There are still times when I find it worth posting something (like the (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) I think it is a case of why he is leaving that got it highlighted not so much that he is leaving. Tim was a great advocate for LUGNET and it is very disturbing that he feels he has to walk away for a while. (...) It does to some of us who have (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | |  | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| What a waste. To highlight a post about someone's hiatus?!? He said hed be back
Anyway, like it matterz Can we stick to more relevant topics for highlighting in the future? . .. ... .... ..... ...... ....... ........ Spydèr ........ ...... ..... (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| |