To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.laflrcOpen lugnet.org.us.laflrc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / LafLRC / 282
281  |  283
Subject: 
Re: 3T Board Change Suggestion
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
Date: 
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:04:22 GMT
Viewed: 
1360 times
  
Well, I just got back from my ski trip.  I read quite a few e-mail while I was gone,
but I have over 200 NXT e-mails still waiting.

As to the tiles in the bottom of the 3T board...

On Sun, January 8, 2006 7:50 pm, Brian Davis wrote:
In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Bryan Bonahoom wrote:
As for John's response about dropping the cube slower, the answer
is no, I can't control the drop rate.

Whatever...My robot works 90% of the time without nudges...which
translates to about 1 nudge every 2 games.

   And I think for a first run at this event, everybody is fairly happy with
that. I took the other apporach (i.e.- make the thing extremely error-resistant,
but not near the limits of speed). That was my decision, and the result is my
current robot is *not* in the runnning for the top slot as we have defined the
rules. I'm OK with that. Hopefully I'll move more towards the speed issue on my
next attempt (got to order some parts...).

The first problem I see with adding tiles is that it will require us to get enough
tiles OF THE SAME COLOR to fill the board.

Next, it could require people with working robots to rebuild, because the board is a
different height.  (small difference)

Finally, (and I would actually feel different if *I* was the ONE person with a robot
that works on the current board) we've seen that it CAN be done, so the rest of us
are going to have to try just a bit harder.  It's totally possible that dropping
blocks from above 4 studs high just won't work.

Like Brian and John, I vote "no change".

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 3T Board Change Suggestion
 
(...) Nudging the cubes was part of the original discussion as I remember it, with the idea that it would be used *if needed* for the *first cut*. Ultimately, I think all the robots should function within the tightest spec possible, which is why I (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)

16 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR