To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.laflrcOpen lugnet.org.us.laflrc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / LafLRC / 277
276  |  278
Subject: 
Re: 3T Board Change Suggestion
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
Date: 
Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:21:27 GMT
Viewed: 
1363 times
  
In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Bryan Bonahoom wrote:

Either way, tiles at the bottom of the cell would allow the robot
to "push" the cube back in the hole so it isn't cocked.

   True, but... I guess my main concern is that as it stands, everybodies can
work (I think) with an occassional nudge or human touch to "correct" a cube. And
we said that would be OK, for at least the first trial. I don't see a reason to
make the challenge easier at this point.

   Lower the bar or raise our standards?

I'd vote no at this point

Well then your vote doesn't count  :)

   Hehe. You asked for a vote - I gave you one. I'm willing to change the
standard if the group wishes... but then you may have to lve with my slow entry
still satisfying the originally proposed challenge, while everybody elses faster
robots had to have the rules changed for them ;-)...

--
Brian Davis



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: 3T Board Change Suggestion
 
Well, in the very first iteration of the board proposal I actually did have tiles in the bases of each square. But Steve had me take them out because he didn't figure anybody would have that many tiles. I'm willing to defer to everybody else's (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
  Re: 3T Board Change Suggestion
 
(...) Wait a minute... You guys are willing to accept a human "nudge" of a cube as part of the spec, and you call adding tiles making the challenge easier?? I guess I don't see a human nudge as an acceptable part fo robot operation. Especially when (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 3T Board Change Suggestion
 
(...) Either way, tiles at the bottom of the cell would allow the robot to "push" the cube back in the hole so it isn't cocked. (...) My robot also supposedly has .5 stud accuracy..but :) (...) Dropping cubes on their sides does not overcome this (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)

16 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR