 | | Re: Hmm
|
|
(...) Iain, unfortunately Hexagone had some imperfect geometry in it. I ended up using the studless single angle beams at the corners. They are not exactly 120 degrees (my protractor says about 125) so I had to force them into that shape a bit. The (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm
|
|
"Rob Stehlik" <robbby31@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HA4C8t.DCq@lugnet.com... (...) That is probably the best way - but I have to define the shape somehow, otherwise it's just a floppy frame. (...) (URL) The other spokes attached to the (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm
|
|
"Rob Stehlik" <robbby31@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HA4C8t.DCq@lugnet.com... (...) (URL) The other spokes attached to the turntable were the result of trial and (...) This is the best I can come up with: (URL) please note the false Birch (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm
|
|
(...) versions of my car assembly line. I was going to try a carousel instead of the conveyor... I couldn't be bothered to do the math, but I think its close. But the exact dimension is across the points, not the sides! So if you wanted to make it (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm
|
|
"Rob Stehlik" <robbby31@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HA4Gu4.3Go@lugnet.com... (...) WHOAH! That would have been really wild, too :) (...) the (...) Aw, crap. I've no idea how to do that... (...) bigger (...) Not quite sure I follow... this is (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm
|
|
"Iain Hendry" <militaryduckjock@rogers.com> wrote in message news:HA4Hu7.6FG@lugnet.com... (...) (URL) now I'm out of a) seats b) red beams c) white beams d) micromotors UGH how do you people BUILD NICE THINGS!!! This is making me cross. Do I have (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm
|
|
(...) I can lend you some yellow or blue seats. As for your question-stares at 11 copies of Soccer Grandstand, 8 seats each-yes. Calum (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm
|
|
"Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:HA4ou2.MDD@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) I guess like, each gondola could have different seats. Gondola Blue, Gondola Yellow, Gondola Red. Theoretically I could do the arms like that, too... (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm
|
|
(...) (URL) is how HUSS is doing the crown and lay-out arm system at the top of the tower, for the Jump. (from: (URL) ) The incredible part of this is that for laying down of the tower onto the trailer (for transporting), see those two pins that (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm
|
|
(...) I hear you. Its tough to get enough Lego to build big things that are colour coordinated. Especially with technic, since studded beams have been virtually discontinued. (...) Yes, Bricklink is a great way to get specific parts you need. But be (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm
|
|
(...) On the Jump and Jump2 the cylinder for doing the shot-up goes right through the centre of the turntable, so I don't think I can do it like that. :/ The only thing I can think of is to put a drive up top for the lifting, on top of the (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm
|
|
(...) Do it! Although red beams may be getting a bit scarce - I just bought over 200... (...) Yeah thats gonna be tricky, but maybe just have a link from the base attached with a turntable? (...) Maybe have power in the tower (hey that rhymes!) and (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm
|
|
"Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message news:HA63LK.KG1@lugnet.com... (...) What on Earth would you want with 200 red beams? Are you up to something? :) (...) Not quite sure I follow... (...) from (...) infra (...) Puting the RCX on the (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hmm
|
|
(...) Yep 8?) (...) OK yeah didnt explain that well at all. I'm thinking a platform in the base goes up & down, it has a rotating link of some kind (turntable) on top that pushes the activating mechanism up & down. Hmmm not sure if thats any (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
