| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Iain Hendry writes:
> "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message
> news:HA63LK.KG1@lugnet.com...
>
> > Do it! Although red beams may be getting a bit scarce - I just bought over
> > 200...
>
> What on Earth would you want with 200 red beams? Are you up to something?
> :)
Yep 8?)
> > Yeah thats gonna be tricky, but maybe just have a link from the base
> > attached with a turntable?
>
> Not quite sure I follow...
OK yeah didnt explain that well at all. I'm thinking a platform in the base
goes up & down, it has a rotating link of some kind (turntable) on top that
pushes the activating mechanism up & down. Hmmm not sure if thats any better....
> > Maybe have power in the tower (hey that rhymes!) and a switch operated • from
> > below by vertical movement? You could possibly do the jump like that too,
> > but it may be a bit harder. Or even a RCX in the tower, controlled by • infra
> > red from another RCX (or remote control?) on the ground??
>
> Puting the RCX on the upper part of the machine is not possible, that
> wouldn't look good at all.
Yep, I thought you might be doing it a bit bigger.
> http://members.rogers.com/militaryduckjock/temp/Imgp1159.jpg
>
> That shows a temporary setup for testing the speed of the hub drive.
Yeah I notice you've already incorporated a clutch gear into the drive 8?)
wouldnt want to put too much sideways pressure on those arms as they're
going up & down...
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Hmm
|
| "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message news:HA63LK.KG1@lugnet.com... (...) What on Earth would you want with 200 red beams? Are you up to something? :) (...) Not quite sure I follow... (...) from (...) infra (...) Puting the RCX on the (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
