To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 4893
4892  |  4894
Subject: 
Re: Yes I am nuts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:50:58 GMT
Viewed: 
378 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Derek Raycraft writes:
Thanks for asking.

But anyway I was thinking about train layouts.  The one thing about
every train layout is that it is just a simple loop.  So I was thinking
maybe its possible to do something different.  This may or may not be
practical, but its an idea we could consider just to do something different.

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=210249

The big problem with this is people that like to crash trains.  The
easiest way to fix this is to have the engineers cooperate so this
doesn't happen.  Or at least it doesn't happen for people who are not
interested in crash their trains.

Another way to resolve this is to make the crossing bridges.  This could
be done in two ways.  Both lines could be made to cross over together.
This would eliminate any chance of collision.  Or the lines could be
woven over each other so they have a level crossing with themselfs, but
not with the other line.  I think this would be the most interesting.
Basically one like would rise over the other line.

The problem of course is the long runs needed to get enough height to
make a track cross over with enough clearance.  2 plates per track
section makes for a long slope.

Another problem is the oddly shaped module needed.  (Outlined in red).
However this modual could be eliminated and bridges could be used to
span the gap from the standard modules.

This would make for a unique layout if we wanted to go to the effort to
build it.

Derek

Personally, the layout is pretty cool...

what you have is two basic seperate areas.  This means you could have 2
"towns" with the area in the middle as transition area.... a sort of
"green space".

I think the cross-overs would be somewhat dangerous for crashing trains,
especially if you let younger "engineers" run the controllers... :)
an elevated cross-over or bridge would probably take more space than
what is available.

Looks pretty good, none-the-less.

Ben



Message is in Reply To:
  Yes I am nuts
 
Thanks for asking. But anyway I was thinking about train layouts. The one thing about every train layout is that it is just a simple loop. So I was thinking maybe its possible to do something different. This may or may not be practical, but its an (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

12 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR