To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 4896
4895  |  4897
Subject: 
Re: Yes I am nuts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:16:19 GMT
Viewed: 
442 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Derek Raycraft writes:

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=210249

Actually, that's pretty similar to an idea that JeffE had.  His idea was to
have a small core area with additional modules attached onto the side of
those core modules.

The big problem with this is people that like to crash trains.  The
easiest way to fix this is to have the engineers cooperate so this
doesn't happen.  Or at least it doesn't happen for people who are not
interested in crash their trains.

The crashing of trains I'm not too concerned with, but what does worry me is
that it increases the number of critical modules (ie, corners).  If you have
ea reliable core of builders (so far, JeffE, me, JeffVW) who've done corners
in the past, plus add smore folks, it would be okay.  But if someone can't
make it, or can't finish a module, then you're kinda out of luck.

The problem of course is the long runs needed to get enough height to
make a track cross over with enough clearance.  2 plates per track
section makes for a long slope.

Another problem is the oddly shaped module needed.  (Outlined in red).
However this modual could be eliminated and bridges could be used to
span the gap from the standard modules.

The odd spacer shouldn't be a problem.

This would make for a unique layout if we wanted to go to the effort to
build it.

Well, why not?  Let's give it a try for this fall!  Maybe one area could be
a port facing inwards.  Another could be a mountain or something.

Calum



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Yes I am nuts
 
(...) I Have enough curved track to do aditional corners (I have 2 already, and my home layout will eventually need 4 (for a basic loop)... Also, this still allows us to do a rail yard off to the side, and we can do a series of track switches (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Yes I am nuts
 
Thanks for asking. But anyway I was thinking about train layouts. The one thing about every train layout is that it is just a simple loop. So I was thinking maybe its possible to do something different. This may or may not be practical, but its an (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

12 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR