Subject:
|
Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:17:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
725 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> It would take a little more development effort to do a hash, but ya. Ouch.
>
> I agree. Ouch. Not only that but it seems to vary across time, some of my
> creations have older email addresses embedded, presumably matching when I
> changed my emails as various acquisitions happened.
>
> feedback (at) mocpages.com is where feedback is solicited and I've sent mail
> there alerting Sean of this thread. Hope that helps. Hope it is fixed.
Thanks Larry,
I wanted to understand method by which my email address was harvested
before address it to MOCPages. Clearly it's a design flaw, and not
something more sinister which was one of my original concerns.
Derek
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
| (...) Derek, everyone: Yes... this was a design flaw on my part; I would never, NEVER sell people's personal information. I, myself, get over 400 pieces of spam every day, and am very sensitive to giving out my own e-mail, phone numbers, etc. I'd (...) (19 years ago, 17-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
| (...) It would take a little more development effort to do a hash, but ya. Ouch. I agree. Ouch. Not only that but it seems to vary across time, some of my creations have older email addresses embedded, presumably matching when I changed my emails as (...) (19 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
14 Messages in This Thread: ![Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Derek Raycraft (16-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Timothy Gould (16-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Derek Raycraft (16-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Larry Pieniazek (16-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Sean Kenney (17-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Derek Raycraft (17-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Gabriele Biffi (16-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Larry Pieniazek (16-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Rob Antonishen <rob.antonishen@gmail.com> (17-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Derek Raycraft (17-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Larry Pieniazek (17-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Dan Boger (17-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Rob Antonishen <rob.antonishen@gmail.com> (17-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|