| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Rob Antonishen <rob.antonishen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/16/05, Larry Pieniazek at@at dot.dot wrote:
> > In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Gabriele Biffi wrote:
> >
> > > There's the same problem here on Lugnet: if you're reading this from the
> > > Lugnet
> > > web site, just look over the "reply" icon, there's a "View raw message"
> > > link.
> > > Try it...
> >
> > The address shown for me is :
> >
> > <lar(at@at)miltontrainworks(dot.dot)com> (that is, it's been mangled, if you
> > "view raw message" for THIS post you'll see what I mean)
>
>
> But if you subscribe via email, the from is unmangled. So a smammer
> would just have to subscribe for a while and collect all the "from"
> addressed (the reply-to is set to the mailing list, however) and bingo
> - has a nice big list of valid addresses.
Well bother. Shows what I know, I haven't subscribed to LUGNET via email (or
used a newsreader to read it, for that matter) since forever. Never mind then, I
guess.
XFut admin.general, this issue affects more than just this group.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
| (...) But if you subscribe via email, the from is unmangled. So a smammer would just have to subscribe for a while and collect all the "from" addressed (the reply-to is set to the mailing list, however) and bingo - has a nice big list of valid (...) (19 years ago, 17-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
