Subject:
|
Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:28:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
803 times
|
| |
|
|
On 11/16/05, Larry Pieniazek at@at dot.dot wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Gabriele Biffi wrote:
>
> > There's the same problem here on Lugnet: if you're reading this from the
> > Lugnet
> > web site, just look over the "reply" icon, there's a "View raw message"
> > link.
> > Try it...
>
> The address shown for me is :
>
> <lar(at@at)miltontrainworks(dot.dot)com> (that is, it's been mangled, if you
> "view raw message" for THIS post you'll see what I mean)
But if you subscribe via email, the from is unmangled. So a smammer
would just have to subscribe for a while and collect all the "from"
addressed (the reply-to is set to the mailing list, however) and bingo
- has a nice big list of valid addresses.
-Rob A>
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
| (...) The address shown for me is : <lar(at@at)miltontra...t.dot)com> (that is, it's been mangled, if you "view raw message" for THIS post you'll see what I mean) Todd put in a way for you to force-mangle your addresses. Not perfect since the coding (...) (19 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
