Subject:
|
Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:35:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
700 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Rob Antonishen wrote:
> But if you subscribe via email, the from is unmangled. So a smammer
> would just have to subscribe for a while and collect all the "from"
> addressed (the reply-to is set to the mailing list, however) and bingo
> - has a nice big list of valid addresses.
Shhhh, Quite you.
Derek
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
| (...) But if you subscribe via email, the from is unmangled. So a smammer would just have to subscribe for a while and collect all the "from" addressed (the reply-to is set to the mailing list, however) and bingo - has a nice big list of valid (...) (19 years ago, 17-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
14 Messages in This Thread: ![Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Derek Raycraft (16-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Timothy Gould (16-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Derek Raycraft (16-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Larry Pieniazek (16-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Derek Raycraft (16-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Sean Kenney (17-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Derek Raycraft (17-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Gabriele Biffi (16-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Larry Pieniazek (16-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Rob Antonishen <rob.antonishen@gmail.com> (17-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Larry Pieniazek (17-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Dan Boger (17-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? -Rob Antonishen <rob.antonishen@gmail.com> (17-Nov-05 to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|