| |
Calum Tsang wrote:
> > How about judge a stack based on maximum height
> > (NOT number of blocks), where the only thing that
> > can be in the stack are standard blocks (no robot-
> > emplaced platforms, for instance).
>
> That's ALWAYS been the case: Only blocks in the stack.
> What do you mean by robot emplaced platform?
What I ment was to patch another hole before it forms: with scoring based
only on total height above the floor, one spoiler strategy would be a single
block on the end of a high pole (or platform). The tower would consist of one
block but might be much taller than other (even multi-block) towers.
--
Brian Davis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Rule check
|
| (...) a) I'm not too concerned except all but the biggest holes, which usually are my fault. The rest I leave as an intellectual exercise for Steve Hassenplug's ego. :) b) "Capping" towers has been extensively discussed a few years ago. The general (...) (20 years ago, 11-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
