| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote:
> Okay, now that HS is done with, back to rtlToronto18. I have modified the rules
> page with the RobA suggested block modification, and have not modifed the
> scoring scheme to encourage block pushing: I agree with other posters than we
> should encourage block stacking, as much as I'd like to encourage entry level
> competitors into the game, I think we all need to step up.
>
> I have offered some scoring examples to clarify.
>
> One more round of commentary, and I'm freezing the rules for good until the week
> before the event :) Am I missing anything?
>
> Calum
If a tower is built touching another tower, are they both considered
free-standing? In otherwords, if someone builds a stack that is 2- or more
blocks wide, how is that scored?
Thanks,
Wayne.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Rule check
|
| (...) My 2 cents: A tower is a tower is a tower. What should score is the hight, not the number of blocks that make up that hight. SO I'd score any three layer tower as a 3 blocks in the fabulous scoring sequence for hight points, even if each layer (...) (20 years ago, 11-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Rule check
|
| Okay, now that HS is done with, back to rtlToronto18. I have modified the rules page with the RobA suggested block modification, and have not modifed the scoring scheme to encourage block pushing: I agree with other posters than we should encourage (...) (20 years ago, 10-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
