| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Brian Davis wrote:
> How about judge a stack based on maximum height (NOT number of blocks), where
> the only thing that can be in the stack are standard blocks (no robot-emplaced
> platforms, for instance).
That's ALWAYS been the case: Only blocks in the stack. What do you mean by
robot emplaced platform?
Calum
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Rule check
|
| (...) What I ment was to patch another hole before it forms: with scoring based only on total height above the floor, one spoiler strategy would be a single block on the end of a high pole (or platform). The tower would consist of one block but (...) (20 years ago, 11-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Rule check
|
| (...) OK, coming in late on this (and, I should add, being unable to currently stack up any blocks even *by hand* in my house due to a 9-month-old), you want to... ...encourage stacking but discourage piling... ...encourage some sorting... (...) How (...) (20 years ago, 11-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
