| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Rob Antonishen wrote:
> > If a tower is built touching another tower, are they both considered
> > free-standing? In otherwords, if someone builds a stack that is 2- or more
> > blocks wide, how is that scored?
>
>
> My 2 cents:
>
> A tower is a tower is a tower. What should score is the hight, not the
> number of blocks that make up that hight.
>
> SO I'd score any three layer tower as a 3 blocks in the fabulous scoring
> sequence for hight points, even if each layer is made of multiple
> touching blocks.
>
> Not sure how the colour and home square bonus should count in that case
> though....possibly on the total block count to reflect the sorting and
> home-square-finding functionality?
I forgot to put it in before, but in previous events, if two towers touched each
other, that was acceptable. They still counted as two separate towers. Scoring
applies as per normal, the rules page has been updated. Thanks Wayne and RobA
for catching this!
Calum
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Rule check
|
| I know I'm getting incredibly picky now, but if my bot had a stack hopper that was 1x2 blocks, the following two scenarios could result (URL) So by the current scoring rules, (1) would count as two 4 block towers even though they touch, but what (...) (20 years ago, 11-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Rule check
|
| (...) My 2 cents: A tower is a tower is a tower. What should score is the hight, not the number of blocks that make up that hight. SO I'd score any three layer tower as a 3 blocks in the fabulous scoring sequence for hight points, even if each layer (...) (20 years ago, 11-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
