Subject:
|
Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:14:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
816 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Derek Raycraft wrote:
> Calum Tsang wrote:
> > Anyone else want to weigh in on "no tower creation" Steve is yes, DaveK is yes.
> > Derek? Chris? Rob? Bruce?
>
> More flip flopping then John Kerry has been accused of on this one.
>
> I thought David said it's a block stacking competition, you should get
> points for stacking blocks.
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/org/ca/rtltoronto/?n=12223
>
>
> On another note, I don't like the negative score idea personally. I'd
> like to see rewards for doing the right things on this one, nothing if
> you do something wrong.
>
> Derek
Well, I could have been adamant, but that would have disenfranchesed the
voters--i mean the other competitors, and also figuring there was those that
can't make a block stacking 'bot but wanted to enter--I was quite adamant that
it was block stacking only, but looking at the scoring, I thought, who cares--a
good block stacker that can consistently stack 7 blocks will beat any 'block
mover'. And this way, it's one competition.
With the negative scores? That's just to keep me from building a block stacker
without a sorter--cause if that rule wasn't there, I'd skip the sorting part.
Dave K
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
| (...) More flip flopping then John Kerry has been accused of on this one. I thought David said it's a block stacking competition, you should get points for stacking blocks. (URL) another note, I don't like the negative score idea personally. I'd (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
