Subject:
|
Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:13:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
895 times
|
| |
|
|
Sorry, I hate to keep beating this horse, but...
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> > In the "scoring" section, did you want to impose a penlty for "wrong" color
> > blocks at home? And, do the blocks HAVE to be in a tower? Currently, the line
> > says:
> > "Location: One point for each block of a tower in the robot's starting square
> > area"
>
> Well, what I read from everyone here was that we shouldn't impose a penalty for
> NOT sorting, but only to give a bonus to those who did. Similarly, in spirit to
> not make a player feel they need to sort AND home. So not penalizing wrong
> colours at home keeps location and sorting separate from each other.
having a -1 for wrong blocks and +1 for right blocks should (in average) result
in a value of zero for people who don't sort. So, there is no color bonus for
blocks AT HOME, unless they are sorted.
>
> I should clarify that no points are given for a single block of correct colour
> in the starting square.
So, people are required to stack?
>
> > With the second,
> > there is actually an advantage to sorting the blocks you take home.
>
> Well, with the emphasis on making towers Derek and DaveK mentioned, points
> shouldn't be awarded for merely pushing blocks into the home square. You do
> need to stack them.
The scoring does put emphasis on stacking. But, if you just want to sort them,
and push them to your home square (unstacked) you get more points for sorting
better. (that's a good entry level challenge)
Also, is 30 blocks enough? Is that 15 black & 15 white?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
| (...) No, we need to beat the horse. Beating the horse is part of the process, the discourse is required. Your comments are appreciated. (...) So, scenarios with the posted ruleset for home are: Pile of unstacked bricks in home: No points. Tower of (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
| (...) Now that you mention it, it should be the sixteenth then, shouldn't it? (...) Yeah, that would make more sense... (...) Well, what I read from everyone here was that we shouldn't impose a penalty for NOT sorting, but only to give a bonus to (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
