Subject:
|
Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:35:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
836 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
> > Is it possible to make the blocks the other way:
> >
> > TILE
> > BRICK
> > PLATE
> > It makes it easier to handle the blocks as they don't have a
> > significant concavity on the bottom that way.
>
> See, trying to keep my head down so as to not rock the boat anymore--but I
> thought about this after I saw Calums pic and I thought taht what Rob said could
> work better, so I'll just agree with him.
Okay, I'll change it.
> Eh, I'm okay with non-stacked blocks on the home square.
> So if you don't stack, the first and second part of the equation = 0 but the
> last two parts can still give you a total.
Assuming your roll of the global dice gives you that sample that's 1:1. You
could come up lucky and get all your colour just for pushing them in.
Anyone else want to weigh in on "no tower creation" Steve is yes, DaveK is yes.
Derek? Chris? Rob? Bruce?
Calum
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
| (...) More flip flopping then John Kerry has been accused of on this one. I thought David said it's a block stacking competition, you should get points for stacking blocks. (URL) another note, I don't like the negative score idea personally. I'd (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: <snip> (...) I thought of that--what if the opponent gets all 30 blocks onto his square without stacking. That'd be 30 points for him (assuming that there was no wrong colour there) I would have to (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
| (...) I've got the headphones CRANKED and am listening to the FULL version of this: (URL) some vain attempt to regain my dwindling youth, DUB DUB, ya'll .---...---new topic---...--- OK, really. someone call me and explain why we FORGET the +1 -1 if (...) (20 years ago, 30-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
| (...) See, trying to keep my head down so as to not rock the boat anymore--but I thought about this after I saw Calums pic and I thought taht what Rob said could work better, so I'll just agree with him. As for the scoring issue--lets see if I got (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
