To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 10743
10742  |  10744
Subject: 
Re: The NEXT game.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:42:03 GMT
Viewed: 
397 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
build a robot, that starts off no larger than 8" cubed, and have it
drive forward (maybe 3 feet ish) to find a rope suspended 12"  off the
ground.

How about 9" cube?  No special reason - just want to make it a bit easier. ;)

the first robot to climb the twelve foot height to ring the bell will
win.

With a 12 foot height we need to able to lower the rope remotely i.e. pulley at
the top.  Since most of the time the bots will get stuck up there, having people
climb up 9 foot ladder all the time takes too long and is a big safety hazard.

It worries me that we may see disintegrating bot falling on people's head, but I
like the height which will look really cool.

I prefer to allow the bot to leave part of it on the ground.  The objective is
to ring the bell, like getting the flag in the gap crossing game.  I would
rather see small quick climbers than slow ones trying pull 2 RCX & 4+ moters at
1 cm/s.

Which month will this event happen?



Message is in Reply To:
  The NEXT game.
 
In conversations that started off with Bruce, and expanded to a few of us at the end of the night.... I think we have a working game to be argued about here. our criteria. 1. Chris does not want to hump the 8x8' play field anywhere 2. Bruce does (...) (20 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

14 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR